From: Kevin <ke...@dr...> - 2006-04-20 22:06:15
|
> hey guys, > > a side note i just remembered. > > in the feed items table, on my install, i've stripped out the > auto-timestamping on the cache_time field...since this is actually > changing > valid data from the rss feed. in order to do it correctly, i'd add > another > field for date_changed or something, which is then updated when the use= r > marks the item read (or whatever other action). > > any objections to me correcting that, or shall i just add it as a > bug/feature request for the time-being? (if sourceforge wants to work.= ..i > am getting only 500 errors tonight.) publish_time uses the timestamp from the rss feed. cache_time is when it is inserted into the database. It is primarily use= d for items deletes. We also display it in the view. Do we care when a user marks an item read? How is that useful? --=20 Kevin |