Re: [Fofredux-devel] A few changes

[Andrew T. <ajt...@hi...>]

Good point about the keyboard implementation and other benefits. We
should do a quick review/analysis of the available libraries before
choosing one.

Andrew

On 3/21/06, Kevin <ke...@dr...> wrote:
>
> > Definitely, I think Ajax is great thing for smooth user-interface and
> > will definitely be put into FoFRedux 0.4. I just want to make sure we
> > keep our design heads about us when putting it in. :)
> >
> > I've used prototype a bunch and it's very nice. However, it can be
> > very heavyweight. There is MooFX which is supposed to be a much
> > lighter-weight, but fairly full-featured Ajax library. Worst case, we
> > just write the straight ajax, which is pretty simple and I've done
> > that before as well.
>
> I haven't used Prototype yet, but have read the docs and quite a few
> reviews.  It's benefits are not limited to Ajax.  I think the event
> handling and OO helper objects/functions look very useful also.   The
> event handling specifically, looks like it will save alot of effort
> finishing up the keyboard shortcut work.
>
> -Kevin
>
>
>
> --
> Kevin
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting langua=
ge
> that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webc=
ast
> and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territor=
y!
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmdlnk&kid=110944&bid$1720&dat=121642
> _______________________________________________
> Fofredux-devel mailing list
> Fof...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fofredux-devel
>


--
Andrew Turner
ajt...@hi...        42.4266N x 83.4931W
http://highearthorbit.com              Northville, Michigan, USA