From: Andrew T. (nilspace) <nil...@us...> - 2006-02-24 00:04:24
|
What about you other devs or people that grab the "Dev" versions of FoFRedux? Subversion clients aren't as commonly installed by default as CVS and the command options are different. I'm willing to give SVN a try as long as it doesn't put too much of a burden on the rest of our current devs/edge users. Andrew On 2/23/06, Kevin <ke...@dr...> wrote: > > I too like SVN, but is there real value for us in migrating the > > already existing project from CVS to SVN? I haven't done it, but I > > assume you can migrate histories as well? > > > > Andrew > > I like the handling of branches and tags better. It's easier and less > error prone. You can rename files and directories while still keeping > history. Some operations can be run locally, without having to hit the > repository. (diff, status are two I use often) > > They do provide an automated migration option. Just submit the request > and the site does it for you. The migration will include all > branches/tags/revisions in the CVS repository. It doesn't alter/remove > the cvs repository so if we decide against it, nothing is lost. > > I'd like to take it for a spin an see how well it works. > > -- > Kevin > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting langua= ge > that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webc= ast > and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territor= y! > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmdlnk&kid=110944&bid$1720&dat=121642 > _______________________________________________ > Fofredux-devel mailing list > Fof...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fofredux-devel > -- Andrew Turner ajt...@hi... 42.4266N x 83.4931W http://highearthorbit.com Northville, Michigan, USA |