From: khaled A. A. <bro...@gm...> - 2006-02-04 11:38:12
|
Sorry Andrew, must have gotten inbetween the cracks (I've been getting hammered by the spammers lately). I can definitely see where you're coming from. Just thinking about this very briefly I don't think something like this is a call for graphics and making it look pretty with loads of images. I would try and make everything fit together in a logical order and would only provide any sort of image if it was adding and contributing to the usage of the thing. This wouldn't be the first interface to a programme that I get down to designing, as I'm currently involved with two others (one of which is wordpress) and I can easily feed on the knownledge I've amassed from there. Let me do a quick and ready sketch for everyone to have a look at (it won't take long) to just put things in a slightly less haphazard fashion. Give it a clear direction so to speak. In terms of new features and whatnot I guess that will come out in the wash= . I'm just interested in using a feed aggregator that sits on my server that looks and acts the part. I honestly believe that FOFR could become the wordpress of aggregators and I'd honestly like it to look the part as well. On 2/2/06, Andrew Turner <ajt...@hi...> wrote: > > Hi Khaled, I left a comment on your site. Maybe it didn't come through? > > We definitely appreciate and welcome input for FoFRedux. I agree that > the interface is getting a little mucky as we add more features. And > our roadmap calls for more features that will need better placement, > layout, etc. > > However, there are probably a couple things to keep in mind, and > should be laid out by the team for future design decisions. I > personally picked up FoF because 1) the code was easy to understand > and modify, 2) it had a simplified interface that allowed me to just > *read* my news rather than ogle the UI and 3) the UI runs on my > desktop, laptop, mobile phone, handheld devices, etc. > > I don't know if this is the case for all the devs/users, and we should > start a discussion regarding this. There are already other feedreaders > out there that do the full-on Ajax with silver bars, etc. (e.g. > Gregarious, fitting name :). FoFRedux is part personal (and hopefully > soon multi-user) feedreader, but also an aggregator (ergo the 'Feed > On' part) to be used for providing feeds to weblogs, other users, > screensavers, etc. So it's also a server-based 'utility'. > > Anyways, if anyone else wants to chime in, please do. And Khaled, > perhaps you can discuss some of your ideas before doing mockups, just > so we can all agree on the path we want FoFRedux to take. > > Thanks for the interest! > Andrew > > On 2/2/06, khaled Abou Alfa <bro...@gm...> wrote: > > Hey everyone, was wondering if anyone has decided to actually sort out > the > > interface design of the application? I'd be more than willing to jump > with > > two feet into this and start sending out mockups that people can commen= t > on. > > Thoughts? > > > > Khaled > > www.brokenkode.com > > > > > -- > Andrew Turner > ajt...@hi... 42.4266N x 83.4931W > http://highearthorbit.com Northville, Michigan, USA > |