From: Miles B. <mil...@gm...> - 2006-01-12 17:59:36
|
On 1/12/06, Andrew Turner (nilspace) <nil...@us...> wrote= : > What do you all think regarding Ajax (or Ajah) support? I personally > like the prototype/behavior/rico stack. It's widely used, heavily > supported & dev'd, and has *Tons* of great features. > > However, my concern is losing the simple cleanliness of FoFRedux. Any > Javascript support will also support non-JS degradation. And there are > some things that adding Ajax style support for would be really nice: > marking an item as read/saved/tagged and having it happen inline > without a page refresh. Refreshing feeds without having to wait while > reading, etc. > > It's a big architecture, moving forward kind of decision and wanted to > get some feedback. For what it's worth. What I have seen of Ajax so far I have really liked. Not being a developer though I can't answer what ramifications a change like this may have. Does Ajax require any special server software? |