From: Andrew T. <ajt...@hi...> - 2005-12-14 23:09:34
|
I think it's ok to leave the lat/lon handling readable from the rss, if it's available, but also allow the user to add a lat/lon to the db specifically if it exists. Make sense? Andy On 12/14/05, Kevin <ke...@dr...> wrote: > > I've backed out these changes until lat/lon handling can be sorted out. > > > > >> I made the lat/lon fields editable since many feeds don't include > >> their location, but it is sometimes discernable. For example, my > >> weatherunderground.com feed does not have a location information, but > >> I *know* where it's located. > >> > >> Perhaps just adding a test that if there is no lat/lon in the feed, > >> check the db for a 'stored' location. I'm already adding functionality > >> in a local version for displaying all this location stuff on a map. > >> > >> Also, Kevin, what did you do with the RSS image stored in the DB when > >> you refactored how feeds are stored? > >> > >> Andy > > > > So, lat and lon need to at least have fields in the db for users to > > enter/override the location info for a feed. Are these fields populate= d > > always or only when the user enters them? > > > > Feed image URL is pulled from the rss cache same as lat,lon, and > > description. I removed the column from the feeds table. > > -- > Kevin > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log fi= les > for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes > searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idv37&alloc_id=16865&opclick > _______________________________________________ > Fofredux-devel mailing list > Fof...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fofredux-devel > -- Andrew Turner ajt...@hi... 42.4266N x 83.4931W http://highearthorbit.com Northville, Michigan, USA |