Re: [Fofredux-devel] change feed attribute storage

[Andrew T. <ajt...@hi...>]

Wow, that's a pretty big change. You don't forsee any other
repurcussions of not storing this metadata in the database? I do see
the benefits, in terms of not having to do updates of the feed, etc.
Let the feed & cache be your storage mechanism.

I did a quick test on my current DB and everything appeared to work
well. I have yet to test an "upgrade" of a FoF v0.19 database.

Also - what is the status of the RSS image Katie? Is this work
complete, in progress for v0.2, or pushed back to v0.3? I wasn't sure
if it changed.
Thanks for the work.
Andy


On 12/13/05, Kevin <ke...@dr...> wrote:
> Katie Bechtold wrote:
>
> >On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 11:21:29AM -0700, Kevin wrote:
> >
> >
> >>I'm not saying eliminate the feed table, just trim it down to what is
> >>absolutely necessary to maintain the relationships between the entities=
 in
> >>the DB.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >I say go for it.
> >
> >
> >
> It was easier then I thought.  I had some time this morning to do it.
>
> Please review these changes:
>
> cvs diff -kk -r PRE_FEEDREFACTOR -r PRE_CR_FEEDREFACTOR
>
> -Kevin
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log fi=
les
> for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
> searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3D7637&alloc_id=3D16865&op=3Dclick
> _______________________________________________
> Fofredux-devel mailing list
> Fof...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fofredux-devel
>


--
Andrew Turner
ajt...@hi...        42.4266N x 83.4931W
http://highearthorbit.com              Northville, Michigan, USA