From: Kevin <ke...@dr...> - 2005-12-12 18:27:28
|
> Ok, that's what I had thought may have been happening (sem-random sort > order). I don't know if the order *needs* to be exactly correct when > the dcdate or timestamp are the same, but at least keeping the feed > order consistent is a must. > > This change should be made and will be put in the 0.2 Release Candidate= . > Thanks for your help > Andy Glad to hear it. I always thought it was strange FoF didn't use the DB for sorting the lists of feeds/items. --=20 Kevin |