From: Andrew T. (nilspace) <nil...@us...> - 2005-12-08 14:13:12
|
Yes, I think pagination can probably wait if there's a concern it may be difficult to fix. I haven't looked at the problem myself yet. Probably something like getting the number of items less than the current viewed feeds as a returned column from a query. There are a couple of other "things" that should be looked at. These can be filed as bugs and moved to 0.3 if necessary: 1) frames sidebard of feeds.php needs to be manually refreshed - should be automatically refreshed when "mark-read.php" is called 2) the "m" (mark read) option now in the sidebar in frames view ends up showing the control panel in the "view" pane rather than an empty set of feeds, or whatever. I need to install the unit test framework to run the unit tests on my insta= ll. I can put together the fofredux.sf.net site this evening and put up Katie's INSTALL readme. BTW - I was kidding about having a feed for the manual. :) Though your suggestion of "tips" feed or something isn't a bad idea. I will make sure to put the RSS link to the SF FoFR news on the webpage. Andy On 12/8/05, Kevin <ke...@dr...> wrote: > Andrew Turner (nilspace) wrote: > > >Hi Everyone, > >Since Kevin pointed out that there are some small issues, but nothing > >showstopping, I've gone ahead and tagged the current cvs RC-0_2. To > >check out do the following: > > > >cvs -d:use...@cv...:/cvsroot/fofredux co -r RC-0_2 -d > >fofredux_0_2 fofredux > > > >This will checkout the tag to a new directory (-d fofredux_0_2). You > >can then do any testing in there. Please file bug reports and mark the > >version and approximate importance. > > > > > > > The only unfixed bugs for 0.2 are: > > #1371750 Pagination When There Is No More > #1371798 fix relative URLs > > Can either of these be pushed to be fixed in 0.3? I think the second > one can. It is an annoying problem, but only affects a minority of > feeds and/or users. > > >Also, is there any input on how we want to do documentation (besides > >small readme's in the folder). A Wiki is often nice, but sometimes can > >get confusing. Or are static pages good enough for now. An RSS feed of > >instructions? :) Any particular thoughts? > > > > > > > I am horrible at writing docs so I'll leave that to ones who can. A few > comments: > > wiki: overkill, but may be useful later on. I'm leaning toward static > HTML documentation. > > RSS of instructions: A feed of instructions doesn't really fit in how > the technology works. I think a feed of "tip of the week/month" would be > neat. > > --Kevin > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log fi= les > for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes > searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3D7637&alloc_id=3D16865&op=3Dclick > _______________________________________________ > Fofredux-devel mailing list > Fof...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fofredux-devel > -- Andrew Turner ajt...@hi... 42.4266N x 83.4931W http://highearthorbit.com Northville, Michigan, USA |