From: Kevin <ke...@dr...> - 2005-11-28 21:31:01
|
>> So, what have we done so far that breaks FoF compatiblity? I guess I'= ll >> have to install it and see. Removing or renaming the "read" column >> definitly will break it. We could set a "compatiblity flag" that will >> keep the "read" column in sync with the read/unread tags. There are >> very >> few places where the read column is altered, so it's not too difficult >> to >> do. > > The problem is, if we switch to tags for state, FOF won't update that > and will *only* update 'read,' which means changes made in FOF won't be > picked up by us. Okay, so it's not just supporting a downgrade path back to FoF, but also running them in parallel. So, the plus for doing this is making it easie= r for existing FoF users to try out FoFr. The downside is we wait a few revs before converting the read column to a tag. --=20 Kevin |