From: Andrew T. <ajt...@hi...> - 2005-11-28 19:30:03
|
On 11/28/05, Kevin <ke...@dr...> wrote: > > For me, just running install.php and doing an OPML import was a *good > enough* upgrade path. ;) Me too - which is why I didn't notice missing tables, etc. in applying FoFRedux to an existing DB. > 30 day old items are by default deleted currently anyways? > > Ben, Do you really think retaining backwards compatiblity with FoF at the > db schema level is a good idea? What about if we provide a decent import > function that pulls the feeds and items from the FoF tables but does not > modify them? We could create a new set of tables (ergo the table prefix change by default) and migrate across for the first time. Does this scale for the future? |