From: Kevin <ke...@dr...> - 2005-11-21 19:44:00
|
Andrew Turner wrote: > I can see the benefits of having a user-defined taxonomy of tags. For >one thing, many feeds supply the blog's categories for the item - so we >could optionally apply these tags by default. I would also like to keep >categories for a more general genre type of organization of feeds. For >example, I want to pull up all of my "technology" feeds, but may not wan= t >to have that as a tag (where tags would be like mac, programming, php). >But maybe not. Let me see if I understand you correctly. You see categories as either: 1) a completely separate concept separate of tags. (containers are used with feeds only, tags are used with items only) 2) a higher level grouping or container of tags. I really don't have an opinion either way. I *can* say that implementing option #1 will be much easier. --=20 Kevin |