fofredux-devel

[Fofredux-devel] Removing the Borders in a compliant way

[Khaled A. A. <kha...@gm...>]

Well it seems we can't be removing the borders from the framesets in a
complaint manner. I've solved the manner (after a quick search) in this
way:

<frameset id="hframeset" rows="<?php echo $rows?>" border="0"
framespacing="0" frameborder="0" >

Anyone got any better ideas? Really annoying to be honest.

Re: [Fofredux-devel] Removing the Borders in a compliant way

[Broken K. <bro...@gm...>]

No worries I've sorted it out, just get rid of everything except
frameborder and it should all work no problems :). Carry one
everyone...except for that previous php question which I would be much
obliged if someone could take a stab at it.


On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 20:32 +0100, Khaled Abou Alfa wrote:
> Well it seems we can't be removing the borders from the framesets in a
> complaint manner. I've solved the manner (after a quick search) in this
> way:
> 
> <frameset id="hframeset" rows="<?php echo $rows?>" border="0"
> framespacing="0" frameborder="0" >
> 
> Anyone got any better ideas? Really annoying to be honest.
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
> Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
> Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
> _______________________________________________
> Fofredux-devel mailing list
> Fof...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fofredux-devel

Re: [Fofredux-devel] Removing the Borders in a compliant way

[Andrew T. <ajt...@hi...>]

To address the "Frame" issue in the future I would think we would move
the sidebar and items with an overflow that will handle a scroll bar.
Using the css overflow seems a much cleaner way to do "frames" - I
just didn't get to doing that yet.

I agree with Kevin that it's a pain to maintain frames/non-frames. And
this is *after* they've been largely merged from the original FOF.

The sidebar can use javascript to show/hide the feeds sidebar, and
maybe fallback to "dual view" for non-javascript browsers.

Andrew

On 8/8/06, Broken Kode <bro...@gm...> wrote:
> No worries I've sorted it out, just get rid of everything except
> frameborder and it should all work no problems :). Carry one
> everyone...except for that previous php question which I would be much
> obliged if someone could take a stab at it.
>
>
> On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 20:32 +0100, Khaled Abou Alfa wrote:
> > Well it seems we can't be removing the borders from the framesets in a
> > complaint manner. I've solved the manner (after a quick search) in this
> > way:
> >
> > <frameset id="hframeset" rows="<?php echo $rows?>" border="0"
> > framespacing="0" frameborder="0" >
> >
> > Anyone got any better ideas? Really annoying to be honest.
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
> > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
> > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
> > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
> > _______________________________________________
> > Fofredux-devel mailing list
> > Fof...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fofredux-devel
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
> Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
> Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
> _______________________________________________
> Fofredux-devel mailing list
> Fof...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fofredux-devel
>


-- 
Andrew Turner
ajt...@hi...        42.4266N x 83.4931W
http://highearthorbit.com              Northville, Michigan, USA

Re: [Fofredux-devel] Removing the Borders in a compliant way

[Miles B. <mil...@gm...>]

On 8/8/06, Andrew Turner <ajt...@hi...> wrote:
> The sidebar can use javascript to show/hide the feeds sidebar, and
> maybe fallback to "dual view" for non-javascript browsers.

Does this mean that we will not have support for the panel view like
it is in 0.3 (but with the new UI)?

I'm not really sure what showing/hiding the feeds sidebar does for us.
And if this is the compromise for the panel view.

-Miles

Re: [Fofredux-devel] Removing the Borders in a compliant way

[Broken K. <bro...@gm...>]

TO kill this issue, I really don't see a problem with the exception of
what we decide is the DEFAULT.

Full view or Framed view don't really differ in anything but the
sidebar. However we can have that come in or out as part of an option
you click in the options bar. 

The difference in structure is effectively, for Framed View:

<frameset id="hframeset" rows="<?php echo $rows?>" frameborder="0" >
<frame src="menu.php?view=frames" name="controls" />
<frameset id="vframeset" cols="<?php echo $cols?>" frameborder="0" >
	<frame src="feeds.php?view=frames"  name="menu" />
	<frame src="view.php?view=frames"  name="items" />
</frameset>
</frameset>

For Full view:

<frameset id="hframeset" rows="<?php echo $rows?>" frameborder="0" >
<frame src="menu.php?view=frames" name="controls" />
<frameset id="vframeset" cols="<?php echo $cols?>" frameborder="0" >
	<frame src="view.php?view=frames"  name="items" />
</frameset>
</frameset>


We're effectively taking away one line. I honestly don't see much of a
problem here, with the exception of what we decide should be the
default. I've voiced my opinion on this matter but I've been known to be
completely of base in the past so maybe we simply put it as a vote.

As for what the categories and tags will look like, that's effectively
just like the framed view, but instead of the feed running down the left
hand side panel we have the category or tag. So if you want to read
items regarding the design category you simply click on that, or
whatever. Nothing too fancy to be honest.

Final point, I just would like the feeds or categories or tags in the
left hand frame to have an odd or even nature so that we can have the
light grey/dark grey structure. If anyone can modify the existing code
from the panel.php file that would be great so that I can continue
hacking and slicing :).

Hope that all makes sense.

On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 16:01 -0700, Miles Beck wrote:
> On 8/8/06, Andrew Turner <ajt...@hi...> wrote:
> > The sidebar can use javascript to show/hide the feeds sidebar, and
> > maybe fallback to "dual view" for non-javascript browsers.
> 
> Does this mean that we will not have support for the panel view like
> it is in 0.3 (but with the new UI)?
> 
> I'm not really sure what showing/hiding the feeds sidebar does for us.
> And if this is the compromise for the panel view.
> 
> -Miles
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
> Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
> Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
> _______________________________________________
> Fofredux-devel mailing list
> Fof...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fofredux-devel

Re: [Fofredux-devel] Removing the Borders in a compliant way

[Andrew T. <ajt...@hi...>]

We're agreed that there will be both a Full-width items, and
FeedList/Items view.
You can click on a feed name in the panel to view items in either
Full/'Frame' view

In the past, the problem w/ the code was that Full and Frame had
diff't menu items, etc. which was the problem. Now that the menu items
will be the same, all is well. The only difference is that there *can*
be a left sidebar for feeds/categories/tags that when clicked will
change the items in the right-side.

I would like to do away with the <frames> and instead implement the
"frames" view as a single page, with an optional:

<div id="sidebar" style="overflow:auto;">
 feed 1
 feed 2
 ...
</div>
kind of listing. That would really be the only difference. That would
either show/hide either via PHP code, or via a Javascript show/hide
sidebar.

Khaled - I don't think I know what you need for the alternating. (same
as Kevin's question). The rows do currently alternate color, and are
changed by <tr> and <tr class='even-row'>. Does that not work for you?

Andrew
On 8/8/06, Broken Kode <bro...@gm...> wrote:
> TO kill this issue, I really don't see a problem with the exception of
> what we decide is the DEFAULT.
>
> Full view or Framed view don't really differ in anything but the
> sidebar. However we can have that come in or out as part of an option
> you click in the options bar.
>
> The difference in structure is effectively, for Framed View:
>
> <frameset id="hframeset" rows="<?php echo $rows?>" frameborder="0" >
> <frame src="menu.php?view=frames" name="controls" />
> <frameset id="vframeset" cols="<?php echo $cols?>" frameborder="0" >
>         <frame src="feeds.php?view=frames"  name="menu" />
>         <frame src="view.php?view=frames"  name="items" />
> </frameset>
> </frameset>
>
> For Full view:
>
> <frameset id="hframeset" rows="<?php echo $rows?>" frameborder="0" >
> <frame src="menu.php?view=frames" name="controls" />
> <frameset id="vframeset" cols="<?php echo $cols?>" frameborder="0" >
>         <frame src="view.php?view=frames"  name="items" />
> </frameset>
> </frameset>
>
>
> We're effectively taking away one line. I honestly don't see much of a
> problem here, with the exception of what we decide should be the
> default. I've voiced my opinion on this matter but I've been known to be
> completely of base in the past so maybe we simply put it as a vote.
>
> As for what the categories and tags will look like, that's effectively
> just like the framed view, but instead of the feed running down the left
> hand side panel we have the category or tag. So if you want to read
> items regarding the design category you simply click on that, or
> whatever. Nothing too fancy to be honest.
>
> Final point, I just would like the feeds or categories or tags in the
> left hand frame to have an odd or even nature so that we can have the
> light grey/dark grey structure. If anyone can modify the existing code
> from the panel.php file that would be great so that I can continue
> hacking and slicing :).
>
> Hope that all makes sense.
>
> On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 16:01 -0700, Miles Beck wrote:
> > On 8/8/06, Andrew Turner <ajt...@hi...> wrote:
> > > The sidebar can use javascript to show/hide the feeds sidebar, and
> > > maybe fallback to "dual view" for non-javascript browsers.
> >
> > Does this mean that we will not have support for the panel view like
> > it is in 0.3 (but with the new UI)?
> >
> > I'm not really sure what showing/hiding the feeds sidebar does for us.
> > And if this is the compromise for the panel view.
> >
> > -Miles
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
> > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
> > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
> > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
> > _______________________________________________
> > Fofredux-devel mailing list
> > Fof...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fofredux-devel
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
> Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
> Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
> _______________________________________________
> Fofredux-devel mailing list
> Fof...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fofredux-devel
>


-- 
Andrew Turner
ajt...@hi...        42.4266N x 83.4931W
http://highearthorbit.com              Northville, Michigan, USA

Re: [Fofredux-devel] Removing the Borders in a compliant way

[Broken K. <bro...@gm...>]

Yeah for some reason I don't get the odd even breakdown into the list in
the feeds.php file. (see screenshot)

It's strange but I can't see (from viewing the page source) how the odd
even seperation occurs in the panel.php but that works for some strange
reason. Is everyone else getting the same thing?
(see screenshot)


(You can also see the beginnings of putting it all together.) 

Regarding removing frame completely, this would mean that the way in
which the programme is used is changed no? I mean that would mean
scrolling would be different etc? I really like the structure of the
frames it just feels like a natural way to deal with things to be
honest.

On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 22:01 -0400, Andrew Turner wrote:
> We're agreed that there will be both a Full-width items, and
> FeedList/Items view.
> You can click on a feed name in the panel to view items in either
> Full/'Frame' view
> 
> In the past, the problem w/ the code was that Full and Frame had
> diff't menu items, etc. which was the problem. Now that the menu items
> will be the same, all is well. The only difference is that there *can*
> be a left sidebar for feeds/categories/tags that when clicked will
> change the items in the right-side.
> 
> I would like to do away with the <frames> and instead implement the
> "frames" view as a single page, with an optional:
> 
> <div id="sidebar" style="overflow:auto;">
>  feed 1
>  feed 2
>  ...
> </div>
> kind of listing. That would really be the only difference. That would
> either show/hide either via PHP code, or via a Javascript show/hide
> sidebar.
> 
> Khaled - I don't think I know what you need for the alternating. (same
> as Kevin's question). The rows do currently alternate color, and are
> changed by <tr> and <tr class='even-row'>. Does that not work for you?
> 
> Andrew
> On 8/8/06, Broken Kode <bro...@gm...> wrote:
> > TO kill this issue, I really don't see a problem with the exception of
> > what we decide is the DEFAULT.
> >
> > Full view or Framed view don't really differ in anything but the
> > sidebar. However we can have that come in or out as part of an option
> > you click in the options bar.
> >
> > The difference in structure is effectively, for Framed View:
> >
> > <frameset id="hframeset" rows="<?php echo $rows?>" frameborder="0" >
> > <frame src="menu.php?view=frames" name="controls" />
> > <frameset id="vframeset" cols="<?php echo $cols?>" frameborder="0" >
> >         <frame src="feeds.php?view=frames"  name="menu" />
> >         <frame src="view.php?view=frames"  name="items" />
> > </frameset>
> > </frameset>
> >
> > For Full view:
> >
> > <frameset id="hframeset" rows="<?php echo $rows?>" frameborder="0" >
> > <frame src="menu.php?view=frames" name="controls" />
> > <frameset id="vframeset" cols="<?php echo $cols?>" frameborder="0" >
> >         <frame src="view.php?view=frames"  name="items" />
> > </frameset>
> > </frameset>
> >
> >
> > We're effectively taking away one line. I honestly don't see much of a
> > problem here, with the exception of what we decide should be the
> > default. I've voiced my opinion on this matter but I've been known to be
> > completely of base in the past so maybe we simply put it as a vote.
> >
> > As for what the categories and tags will look like, that's effectively
> > just like the framed view, but instead of the feed running down the left
> > hand side panel we have the category or tag. So if you want to read
> > items regarding the design category you simply click on that, or
> > whatever. Nothing too fancy to be honest.
> >
> > Final point, I just would like the feeds or categories or tags in the
> > left hand frame to have an odd or even nature so that we can have the
> > light grey/dark grey structure. If anyone can modify the existing code
> > from the panel.php file that would be great so that I can continue
> > hacking and slicing :).
> >
> > Hope that all makes sense.
> >
> > On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 16:01 -0700, Miles Beck wrote:
> > > On 8/8/06, Andrew Turner <ajt...@hi...> wrote:
> > > > The sidebar can use javascript to show/hide the feeds sidebar, and
> > > > maybe fallback to "dual view" for non-javascript browsers.
> > >
> > > Does this mean that we will not have support for the panel view like
> > > it is in 0.3 (but with the new UI)?
> > >
> > > I'm not really sure what showing/hiding the feeds sidebar does for us.
> > > And if this is the compromise for the panel view.
> > >
> > > -Miles
> > >
> > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
> > > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
> > > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
> > > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Fofredux-devel mailing list
> > > Fof...@li...
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fofredux-devel
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
> > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
> > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
> > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
> > _______________________________________________
> > Fofredux-devel mailing list
> > Fof...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fofredux-devel
> >
> 
> 

Re: [Fofredux-devel] Removing the Borders in a compliant way

[Andrew T. <ajt...@hi...>]

Thanks for the screenshot Khaled - this is not how it should look
currently. I may not have checked something in - though I don't see
anything missing.
What browser/OS are you using too? Maybe something in how the css
url's are being put together for the missing icons. And seems like
your feeds.php (sidebar) is old?
I've attached what I see in  frames view.

Also - what you are calling "Full View" is really the "Admin Panel".

Andrew


On 8/9/06, Broken Kode <bro...@gm...> wrote:
> Yeah for some reason I don't get the odd even breakdown into the list in
> the feeds.php file. (see screenshot)
>
> It's strange but I can't see (from viewing the page source) how the odd
> even seperation occurs in the panel.php but that works for some strange
> reason. Is everyone else getting the same thing?
> (see screenshot)
>
>
> (You can also see the beginnings of putting it all together.)
>
> Regarding removing frame completely, this would mean that the way in
> which the programme is used is changed no? I mean that would mean
> scrolling would be different etc? I really like the structure of the
> frames it just feels like a natural way to deal with things to be
> honest.
>
> On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 22:01 -0400, Andrew Turner wrote:
> > We're agreed that there will be both a Full-width items, and
> > FeedList/Items view.
> > You can click on a feed name in the panel to view items in either
> > Full/'Frame' view
> >
> > In the past, the problem w/ the code was that Full and Frame had
> > diff't menu items, etc. which was the problem. Now that the menu items
> > will be the same, all is well. The only difference is that there *can*
> > be a left sidebar for feeds/categories/tags that when clicked will
> > change the items in the right-side.
> >
> > I would like to do away with the <frames> and instead implement the
> > "frames" view as a single page, with an optional:
> >
> > <div id="sidebar" style="overflow:auto;">
> >  feed 1
> >  feed 2
> >  ...
> > </div>
> > kind of listing. That would really be the only difference. That would
> > either show/hide either via PHP code, or via a Javascript show/hide
> > sidebar.
> >
> > Khaled - I don't think I know what you need for the alternating. (same
> > as Kevin's question). The rows do currently alternate color, and are
> > changed by <tr> and <tr class='even-row'>. Does that not work for you?
> >
> > Andrew
> > On 8/8/06, Broken Kode <bro...@gm...> wrote:
> > > TO kill this issue, I really don't see a problem with the exception of
> > > what we decide is the DEFAULT.
> > >
> > > Full view or Framed view don't really differ in anything but the
> > > sidebar. However we can have that come in or out as part of an option
> > > you click in the options bar.
> > >
> > > The difference in structure is effectively, for Framed View:
> > >
> > > <frameset id="hframeset" rows="<?php echo $rows?>" frameborder="0" >
> > > <frame src="menu.php?view=frames" name="controls" />
> > > <frameset id="vframeset" cols="<?php echo $cols?>" frameborder="0" >
> > >         <frame src="feeds.php?view=frames"  name="menu" />
> > >         <frame src="view.php?view=frames"  name="items" />
> > > </frameset>
> > > </frameset>
> > >
> > > For Full view:
> > >
> > > <frameset id="hframeset" rows="<?php echo $rows?>" frameborder="0" >
> > > <frame src="menu.php?view=frames" name="controls" />
> > > <frameset id="vframeset" cols="<?php echo $cols?>" frameborder="0" >
> > >         <frame src="view.php?view=frames"  name="items" />
> > > </frameset>
> > > </frameset>
> > >
> > >
> > > We're effectively taking away one line. I honestly don't see much of a
> > > problem here, with the exception of what we decide should be the
> > > default. I've voiced my opinion on this matter but I've been known to be
> > > completely of base in the past so maybe we simply put it as a vote.
> > >
> > > As for what the categories and tags will look like, that's effectively
> > > just like the framed view, but instead of the feed running down the left
> > > hand side panel we have the category or tag. So if you want to read
> > > items regarding the design category you simply click on that, or
> > > whatever. Nothing too fancy to be honest.
> > >
> > > Final point, I just would like the feeds or categories or tags in the
> > > left hand frame to have an odd or even nature so that we can have the
> > > light grey/dark grey structure. If anyone can modify the existing code
> > > from the panel.php file that would be great so that I can continue
> > > hacking and slicing :).
> > >
> > > Hope that all makes sense.
> > >
> > > On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 16:01 -0700, Miles Beck wrote:
> > > > On 8/8/06, Andrew Turner <ajt...@hi...> wrote:
> > > > > The sidebar can use javascript to show/hide the feeds sidebar, and
> > > > > maybe fallback to "dual view" for non-javascript browsers.
> > > >
> > > > Does this mean that we will not have support for the panel view like
> > > > it is in 0.3 (but with the new UI)?
> > > >
> > > > I'm not really sure what showing/hiding the feeds sidebar does for us.
> > > > And if this is the compromise for the panel view.
> > > >
> > > > -Miles
> > > >
> > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
> > > > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
> > > > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
> > > > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Fofredux-devel mailing list
> > > > Fof...@li...
> > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fofredux-devel
> > >
> > >
> > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
> > > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
> > > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
> > > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Fofredux-devel mailing list
> > > Fof...@li...
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fofredux-devel
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
>


-- 
Andrew Turner
ajt...@hi...        42.4266N x 83.4931W
http://highearthorbit.com              Northville, Michigan, USA

Re: [Fofredux-devel] Removing the Borders in a compliant way

[khaled A. A. <bro...@gm...>]

Okay that's DEFINITELY not what I've got going here :). That looks
brilliant!!!  Erm...hang on a minute which folder should I be taking the
above from? I think I got the files from the UIDesign folder or something
along those lines.

Could you possibly send through the latest files for me because I've
obviously not got the proper SVN folder? Is it too much hassle as a zip or
something like that?

On 8/9/06, Andrew Turner <ajt...@hi...> wrote:
>
> Thanks for the screenshot Khaled - this is not how it should look
> currently. I may not have checked something in - though I don't see
> anything missing.
> What browser/OS are you using too? Maybe something in how the css
> url's are being put together for the missing icons. And seems like
> your feeds.php (sidebar) is old?
> I've attached what I see in  frames view.
>
> Also - what you are calling "Full View" is really the "Admin Panel".
>
> Andrew
>
>
> On 8/9/06, Broken Kode <bro...@gm...> wrote:
> > Yeah for some reason I don't get the odd even breakdown into the list in
> > the feeds.php file. (see screenshot)
> >
> > It's strange but I can't see (from viewing the page source) how the odd
> > even seperation occurs in the panel.php but that works for some strange
> > reason. Is everyone else getting the same thing?
> > (see screenshot)
> >
> >
> > (You can also see the beginnings of putting it all together.)
> >
> > Regarding removing frame completely, this would mean that the way in
> > which the programme is used is changed no? I mean that would mean
> > scrolling would be different etc? I really like the structure of the
> > frames it just feels like a natural way to deal with things to be
> > honest.
> >
> > On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 22:01 -0400, Andrew Turner wrote:
> > > We're agreed that there will be both a Full-width items, and
> > > FeedList/Items view.
> > > You can click on a feed name in the panel to view items in either
> > > Full/'Frame' view
> > >
> > > In the past, the problem w/ the code was that Full and Frame had
> > > diff't menu items, etc. which was the problem. Now that the menu items
> > > will be the same, all is well. The only difference is that there *can*
> > > be a left sidebar for feeds/categories/tags that when clicked will
> > > change the items in the right-side.
> > >
> > > I would like to do away with the <frames> and instead implement the
> > > "frames" view as a single page, with an optional:
> > >
> > > <div id="sidebar" style="overflow:auto;">
> > >  feed 1
> > >  feed 2
> > >  ...
> > > </div>
> > > kind of listing. That would really be the only difference. That would
> > > either show/hide either via PHP code, or via a Javascript show/hide
> > > sidebar.
> > >
> > > Khaled - I don't think I know what you need for the alternating. (same
> > > as Kevin's question). The rows do currently alternate color, and are
> > > changed by <tr> and <tr class='even-row'>. Does that not work for you?
> > >
> > > Andrew
> > > On 8/8/06, Broken Kode <bro...@gm...> wrote:
> > > > TO kill this issue, I really don't see a problem with the exception
> of
> > > > what we decide is the DEFAULT.
> > > >
> > > > Full view or Framed view don't really differ in anything but the
> > > > sidebar. However we can have that come in or out as part of an
> option
> > > > you click in the options bar.
> > > >
> > > > The difference in structure is effectively, for Framed View:
> > > >
> > > > <frameset id="hframeset" rows="<?php echo $rows?>" frameborder="0" >
> > > > <frame src="menu.php?view=frames" name="controls" />
> > > > <frameset id="vframeset" cols="<?php echo $cols?>" frameborder="0" >
> > > >         <frame src="feeds.php?view=frames"  name="menu" />
> > > >         <frame src="view.php?view=frames"  name="items" />
> > > > </frameset>
> > > > </frameset>
> > > >
> > > > For Full view:
> > > >
> > > > <frameset id="hframeset" rows="<?php echo $rows?>" frameborder="0" >
> > > > <frame src="menu.php?view=frames" name="controls" />
> > > > <frameset id="vframeset" cols="<?php echo $cols?>" frameborder="0" >
> > > >         <frame src="view.php?view=frames"  name="items" />
> > > > </frameset>
> > > > </frameset>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > We're effectively taking away one line. I honestly don't see much of
> a
> > > > problem here, with the exception of what we decide should be the
> > > > default. I've voiced my opinion on this matter but I've been known
> to be
> > > > completely of base in the past so maybe we simply put it as a vote.
> > > >
> > > > As for what the categories and tags will look like, that's
> effectively
> > > > just like the framed view, but instead of the feed running down the
> left
> > > > hand side panel we have the category or tag. So if you want to read
> > > > items regarding the design category you simply click on that, or
> > > > whatever. Nothing too fancy to be honest.
> > > >
> > > > Final point, I just would like the feeds or categories or tags in
> the
> > > > left hand frame to have an odd or even nature so that we can have
> the
> > > > light grey/dark grey structure. If anyone can modify the existing
> code
> > > > from the panel.php file that would be great so that I can continue
> > > > hacking and slicing :).
> > > >
> > > > Hope that all makes sense.
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 16:01 -0700, Miles Beck wrote:
> > > > > On 8/8/06, Andrew Turner <ajt...@hi...> wrote:
> > > > > > The sidebar can use javascript to show/hide the feeds sidebar,
> and
> > > > > > maybe fallback to "dual view" for non-javascript browsers.
> > > > >
> > > > > Does this mean that we will not have support for the panel view
> like
> > > > > it is in 0.3 (but with the new UI)?
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm not really sure what showing/hiding the feeds sidebar does for
> us.
> > > > > And if this is the compromise for the panel view.
> > > > >
> > > > > -Miles
> > > > >
> > > > >
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services,
> security?
> > > > > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your
> job easier
> > > > > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache
> Geronimo
> > > > >
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Fofredux-devel mailing list
> > > > > Fof...@li...
> > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fofredux-devel
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services,
> security?
> > > > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your
> job easier
> > > > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache
> Geronimo
> > > >
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Fofredux-devel mailing list
> > > > Fof...@li...
> > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fofredux-devel
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Andrew Turner
> ajt...@hi...        42.4266N x 83.4931W
> http://highearthorbit.com              Northville, Michigan, USA
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
> Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job
> easier
> Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
>
> _______________________________________________
> Fofredux-devel mailing list
> Fof...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fofredux-devel
>
>
>
>

Re: [Fofredux-devel] Removing the Borders in a compliant way

[Kevin <ke...@dr...>]

khaled Abou Alfa wrote:
> Okay that's DEFINITELY not what I've got going here :). That looks 
> brilliant!!!  Erm...hang on a minute which folder should I be taking 
> the above from? I think I got the files from the UIDesign folder or 
> something along those lines.
>
> Could you possibly send through the latest files for me because I've 
> obviously not got the proper SVN folder? Is it too much hassle as a 
> zip or something like that?
>
My copy looks the same as Andrew's screenshots.   You should be using 
the trunk directory in the repository. 
(https://svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/fofredux/fofredux/trunk)  If you 
are not, your svn software should have a switch function to change URLs 
for the working directory.

Here are snapshots of trunk.  Made fresh every morning.  Get them while 
they're hot! http://fofredux.sourceforge.net/snapshots/

-Kevin

Re: [Fofredux-devel] Removing the Borders in a compliant way

[Andrew T. <ajt...@hi...>]

Sorry about that - I should have specified that this is all on the SVN
trunk. I decided to make the entire code more stable and just put it
on Trunk to prevent to much merge over from a branch. Kevin is too
busy with making bug fixes all the time. :)

Khaled & others - let us know if checking out of Head doesn't work for
you. Sorry again for the confusion.
Andrew

On 8/9/06, Kevin <ke...@dr...> wrote:
> khaled Abou Alfa wrote:
> > Okay that's DEFINITELY not what I've got going here :). That looks
> > brilliant!!!  Erm...hang on a minute which folder should I be taking
> > the above from? I think I got the files from the UIDesign folder or
> > something along those lines.
> >
> > Could you possibly send through the latest files for me because I've
> > obviously not got the proper SVN folder? Is it too much hassle as a
> > zip or something like that?
> >
> My copy looks the same as Andrew's screenshots.   You should be using
> the trunk directory in the repository.
> (https://svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/fofredux/fofredux/trunk)  If you
> are not, your svn software should have a switch function to change URLs
> for the working directory.
>
> Here are snapshots of trunk.  Made fresh every morning.  Get them while
> they're hot! http://fofredux.sourceforge.net/snapshots/
>
> -Kevin
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
> Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
> Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
> _______________________________________________
> Fofredux-devel mailing list
> Fof...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fofredux-devel
>


-- 
Andrew Turner
ajt...@hi...        42.4266N x 83.4931W
http://highearthorbit.com              Northville, Michigan, USA