fofredux-devel

[Fofredux-devel] SimplePie?

[khaled A. A. <bro...@gm...>]

Have you guys read about SimplePie http://simplepie.org/ ? Is this something
that we can test to see if it's faster to use than the Magpie system that
FOFR is using or am I completely out of my depth ? I'm just asking from the
point of view of increasing speed of reading the feeds...

Re: [Fofredux-devel] SimplePie?

[Evan R. <eva...@gm...>]

replacing magpie won't alter speed in reading feeds, since they are
all pulled directly from your mysql install.  simplepie could, at
first glance, perhaps manage to speed up updating of the feeds, since
that is where magpie is used.
in the end, "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" probably applies here.
but i'm all for improvments...perhaps in the release after next, we
could check it out?

/evan

On 6/9/06, khaled Abou Alfa <bro...@gm...> wrote:
> Have you guys read about SimplePie http://simplepie.org/ ? Is this something
> that we can test to see if it's faster to use than the Magpie system that
> FOFR is using or am I completely out of my depth ? I'm just asking from the
> point of view of increasing speed of reading the feeds...
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Fofredux-devel mailing list
> Fof...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fofredux-devel
>
>
>

Re: [Fofredux-devel] SimplePie?

[khaled A. A. <bro...@gm...>]

Ah ok, it's just that as I've been using FOFR more and more lately that's
been one of the issues that I've found to be a tad bit annoying. The speed
of updating feeds. Originally I thought there was little we could do, but if
there's a newer better framework in place that might help sort out that
aspect of the programme then I'm all up for it :).

Hey Evan you excited about today?

On 6/9/06, Evan Roth <eva...@gm...> wrote:
>
> replacing magpie won't alter speed in reading feeds, since they are
> all pulled directly from your mysql install.  simplepie could, at
> first glance, perhaps manage to speed up updating of the feeds, since
> that is where magpie is used.
> in the end, "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" probably applies here.
> but i'm all for improvments...perhaps in the release after next, we
> could check it out?
>
> /evan
>
> On 6/9/06, khaled Abou Alfa <bro...@gm...> wrote:
> > Have you guys read about SimplePie http://simplepie.org/ ? Is this
> something
> > that we can test to see if it's faster to use than the Magpie system
> that
> > FOFR is using or am I completely out of my depth ? I'm just asking from
> the
> > point of view of increasing speed of reading the feeds...
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Fofredux-devel mailing list
> > Fof...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fofredux-devel
> >
> >
> >
>

Re: [Fofredux-devel] SimplePie?

[Kevin <ke...@dr...>]

khaled Abou Alfa wrote:

> Ah ok, it's just that as I've been using FOFR more and more lately 
> that's been one of the issues that I've found to be a tad bit 
> annoying. The speed of updating feeds. Originally I thought there was 
> little we could do, but if there's a newer better framework in place 
> that might help sort out that aspect of the programme then I'm all up 
> for it :).

Anyone with more then a handful of feeds has had this problem.  Update 
is a sequential operation and if one feed is slow to respond, it slows 
down the whole operation.

I think feature #1371230 is a good solution for this.  You'll be able to 
set a time of how often you want each feed to update.  When update_all 
runs, it will look for only the feeds that have not been updated since 
$update_interval.   That way, only a subset of your feeds will update 
during each run.  Hopefully, the ones  you are most interested in 
keeping fresh, because you will have set a lower update interval for them.

-Kevin

Re: [Fofredux-devel] SimplePie?

[Evan R. <eva...@gm...>]

I'm an american, so it's tough to cheer for germany...but i was just
out getting a new satellite dish, and there is absolutely noone on the
streets anywhere.  the guys at the shop were annoyed they had to stop
watching the game and help me...this country is crazy for their
soccer.

/evan

On 6/9/06, Kevin <ke...@dr...> wrote:
> khaled Abou Alfa wrote:
>
> > Ah ok, it's just that as I've been using FOFR more and more lately
> > that's been one of the issues that I've found to be a tad bit
> > annoying. The speed of updating feeds. Originally I thought there was
> > little we could do, but if there's a newer better framework in place
> > that might help sort out that aspect of the programme then I'm all up
> > for it :).
>
> Anyone with more then a handful of feeds has had this problem.  Update
> is a sequential operation and if one feed is slow to respond, it slows
> down the whole operation.
>
> I think feature #1371230 is a good solution for this.  You'll be able to
> set a time of how often you want each feed to update.  When update_all
> runs, it will look for only the feeds that have not been updated since
> $update_interval.   That way, only a subset of your feeds will update
> during each run.  Hopefully, the ones  you are most interested in
> keeping fresh, because you will have set a lower update interval for them.
>
> -Kevin
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Fofredux-devel mailing list
> Fof...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fofredux-devel
>