While exploring the dense Rhombiccubeoctahedron at N=12, bad number results were found. This was due to large numbers being scientifically notated instead of parsed as integers. Resizing is now dynamic and fun. Currently, as far as I know, there are no mistakes except forgetting to update the version number.
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
While exploring the dense Rhombiccubeoctahedron at N=12, bad number results were found. This was due to large numbers being scientifically notated instead of parsed as integers. Resizing is now dynamic and fun. Currently, as far as I know, there are no mistakes except forgetting to update the version number.