You can subscribe to this list here.
2007 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(18) |
Sep
(12) |
Oct
(11) |
Nov
|
Dec
(3) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2008 |
Jan
(4) |
Feb
(5) |
Mar
(18) |
Apr
(4) |
May
(6) |
Jun
(6) |
Jul
(25) |
Aug
(19) |
Sep
(11) |
Oct
(23) |
Nov
(15) |
Dec
(13) |
2009 |
Jan
(15) |
Feb
(11) |
Mar
(75) |
Apr
(34) |
May
(24) |
Jun
(37) |
Jul
(32) |
Aug
(64) |
Sep
(65) |
Oct
(24) |
Nov
(28) |
Dec
(30) |
2010 |
Jan
(43) |
Feb
(55) |
Mar
(18) |
Apr
(51) |
May
(28) |
Jun
(68) |
Jul
(27) |
Aug
(28) |
Sep
(38) |
Oct
(41) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(18) |
2011 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
(33) |
Mar
(30) |
Apr
(13) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(20) |
Jul
(9) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(33) |
Oct
(38) |
Nov
(17) |
Dec
(12) |
2012 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
(4) |
Jul
|
Aug
(3) |
Sep
|
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(2) |
2013 |
Jan
|
Feb
(2) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(2) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
(2) |
2014 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2015 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2019 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: Thiago M. (timba) <thi...@fl...> - 2012-01-06 11:00:16
|
Hi Subrata, Have you tried to install using the Eclipse Marketplace? We are there. Best Thiago Moreira On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 3:16 AM, Subrata Candra <sub...@gm...>wrote: > hi, im currently creating a j2me mobile games > and i need a database for it > > i searched at google and found floggy is good > but fail to install the API > it says that the link for software updates is > floggy.sourceforge.net/eclipse/ > but when i try to access it from eclipse i didnt get anything to be > installed > > btw i use eclipse indigo (3.7) > thanks > > Best Regards > Subrata Candra > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex > infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to > virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual > desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure > costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox > _______________________________________________ > floggy-user mailing list > flo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/floggy-user > |
From: Subrata C. <sub...@gm...> - 2012-01-06 05:17:06
|
hi, im currently creating a j2me mobile games and i need a database for it i searched at google and found floggy is good but fail to install the API it says that the link for software updates is floggy.sourceforge.net/eclipse/ but when i try to access it from eclipse i didnt get anything to be installed btw i use eclipse indigo (3.7) thanks Best Regards Subrata Candra |
From: Samuel S. <sam...@gm...> - 2012-01-03 03:55:17
|
Hello Thiago, Thank you. Regards, S.A.Norton Stanley On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 4:32 AM, Thiago Moreira (timba) < thi...@fl...> wrote: > > Hey Samuel, > > You are right. Take a look at this code: > https://github.com/floggy/persistence-jme/blob/master/floggy-persistence-test/src/main/java/net/sourceforge/floggy/persistence/beans/FloggyVector.java > > Best > > Thiago Moreira > > > On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 8:55 AM, Samuel Stanley <sam...@gm...>wrote: > >> Hello All, >> >> I have a query regarding a list of cascade Persistable fields. Consider >> the following sample: >> >> public class PersonStore implements Persistable,Deletable { >> >> * //A list which holds Person objects* >> private Vector personList; >> >> public PersonStore() { >> super(); >> personList=new Vector(); >> } >> >> public void addPerson(Person personData){ >> personList.addElement(personData); >> } >> >> * * >> public void delete() throws FloggyException { >> >> } >> >> } >> >> Now in my delete() method should PersistableManager.getInstance().delete(); >> be invoked on each of the Person object present in the personList? Kindly >> help me with this. >> >> Thanking you, >> Regards, >> S.A.Norton Stanley >> > > |
From: Thiago M. (timba) <thi...@fl...> - 2012-01-02 23:02:47
|
Hey Samuel, You are right. Take a look at this code: https://github.com/floggy/persistence-jme/blob/master/floggy-persistence-test/src/main/java/net/sourceforge/floggy/persistence/beans/FloggyVector.java Best Thiago Moreira On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 8:55 AM, Samuel Stanley <sam...@gm...>wrote: > Hello All, > > I have a query regarding a list of cascade Persistable fields. Consider > the following sample: > > public class PersonStore implements Persistable,Deletable { > > * //A list which holds Person objects* > private Vector personList; > > public PersonStore() { > super(); > personList=new Vector(); > } > > public void addPerson(Person personData){ > personList.addElement(personData); > } > > * * > public void delete() throws FloggyException { > > } > > } > > Now in my delete() method should PersistableManager.getInstance().delete(); > be invoked on each of the Person object present in the personList? Kindly > help me with this. > > Thanking you, > Regards, > S.A.Norton Stanley > |
From: Samuel S. <sam...@gm...> - 2012-01-02 10:55:59
|
Hello All, I have a query regarding a list of cascade Persistable fields. Consider the following sample: public class PersonStore implements Persistable,Deletable { * //A list which holds Person objects* private Vector personList; public PersonStore() { super(); personList=new Vector(); } public void addPerson(Person personData){ personList.addElement(personData); } * * public void delete() throws FloggyException { } } Now in my delete() method should PersistableManager.getInstance().delete(); be invoked on each of the Person object present in the personList? Kindly help me with this. Thanking you, Regards, S.A.Norton Stanley |
From: Samuel S. <sam...@gm...> - 2012-01-02 10:42:38
|
Hello Thiago, Thank you. I debugged to find that the method gets invoked when reset is called on the parent object. Thanking you, Regards, S.A.Norton Stanley On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Samuel Stanley <sam...@gm...>wrote: > Hello Thiago, > > Thank you. When does this method get invoked? > > > Thanking you, > Regards, > S.A.Norton Stanley > > On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 3:32 AM, Thiago Moreira (timba) < > thi...@fl...> wrote: > >> >> Hey Samuel, >> >> The method is called automatically. >> >> Best >> >> Thiago Moreira >> >> On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 3:45 AM, Samuel Stanley <sam...@gm... >> > wrote: >> >>> Hello All, >>> >>> I would like to know if the delete() method provided by the Deletable >>> interface is invoked automatically or should it be explicitly called when >>> the Persistence store is reset? >>> >>> In the example below is it required that the user explicitly calls the >>> delete method on the Order object? >>> >>> public class Order implements Persistable, Deletable { >>> protected Shipment shipment; >>> >>> public void delete() throws FloggyException { >>> if (shipment != null) { >>> PersistableManager.getInstance().delete(shipment); >>> } >>> } >>> } >>> >>> *Thanking you, >>> Regards, >>> S.A.Norton Stanley* >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> Write once. Port to many. >>> Get the SDK and tools to simplify cross-platform app development. Create >>> new or port existing apps to sell to consumers worldwide. Explore the >>> Intel AppUpSM program developer opportunity. appdeveloper.intel.com/join >>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-appdev >>> _______________________________________________ >>> floggy-user mailing list >>> flo...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/floggy-user >>> >>> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex >> infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to >> virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual >> desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure >> costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox >> >> _______________________________________________ >> floggy-user mailing list >> flo...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/floggy-user >> >> > |
From: Samuel S. <sam...@gm...> - 2011-12-31 05:11:07
|
Hello Thiago, Thank you. When does this method get invoked? Thanking you, Regards, S.A.Norton Stanley On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 3:32 AM, Thiago Moreira (timba) < thi...@fl...> wrote: > > Hey Samuel, > > The method is called automatically. > > Best > > Thiago Moreira > > On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 3:45 AM, Samuel Stanley <sam...@gm...>wrote: > >> Hello All, >> >> I would like to know if the delete() method provided by the Deletable >> interface is invoked automatically or should it be explicitly called when >> the Persistence store is reset? >> >> In the example below is it required that the user explicitly calls the >> delete method on the Order object? >> >> public class Order implements Persistable, Deletable { >> protected Shipment shipment; >> >> public void delete() throws FloggyException { >> if (shipment != null) { >> PersistableManager.getInstance().delete(shipment); >> } >> } >> } >> >> *Thanking you, >> Regards, >> S.A.Norton Stanley* >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Write once. Port to many. >> Get the SDK and tools to simplify cross-platform app development. Create >> new or port existing apps to sell to consumers worldwide. Explore the >> Intel AppUpSM program developer opportunity. appdeveloper.intel.com/join >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-appdev >> _______________________________________________ >> floggy-user mailing list >> flo...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/floggy-user >> >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex > infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to > virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual > desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure > costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox > _______________________________________________ > floggy-user mailing list > flo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/floggy-user > > |
From: Thiago M. (timba) <thi...@fl...> - 2011-12-28 22:02:39
|
Hey Samuel, The method is called automatically. Best Thiago Moreira On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 3:45 AM, Samuel Stanley <sam...@gm...>wrote: > Hello All, > > I would like to know if the delete() method provided by the Deletable > interface is invoked automatically or should it be explicitly called when > the Persistence store is reset? > > In the example below is it required that the user explicitly calls the > delete method on the Order object? > > public class Order implements Persistable, Deletable { > protected Shipment shipment; > > public void delete() throws FloggyException { > if (shipment != null) { > PersistableManager.getInstance().delete(shipment); > } > } > } > > *Thanking you, > Regards, > S.A.Norton Stanley* > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Write once. Port to many. > Get the SDK and tools to simplify cross-platform app development. Create > new or port existing apps to sell to consumers worldwide. Explore the > Intel AppUpSM program developer opportunity. appdeveloper.intel.com/join > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-appdev > _______________________________________________ > floggy-user mailing list > flo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/floggy-user > > |
From: Samuel S. <sam...@gm...> - 2011-12-28 05:45:47
|
Hello All, I would like to know if the delete() method provided by the Deletable interface is invoked automatically or should it be explicitly called when the Persistence store is reset? In the example below is it required that the user explicitly calls the delete method on the Order object? public class Order implements Persistable, Deletable { protected Shipment shipment; public void delete() throws FloggyException { if (shipment != null) { PersistableManager.getInstance().delete(shipment); } } } *Thanking you, Regards, S.A.Norton Stanley* |
From: Thiago M. (timba) <thi...@fl...> - 2011-12-21 12:26:37
|
Hey Bruno, Have you tried to make the install in a clean Eclipse installation? Best Thiago Moreira On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 12:17 PM, Bruno Barros <bru...@ms...> wrote: > Hi all. I'm trying to update my floggy plugin on eclipse to 1.4.0, but i > cant make it work. > > First of all, theres no Add floggy nature on the menu in my project. > Second, when i try to run the application, even with the floggy jar in my > class path, the following error shows: No PersistableManager implementation > was found. Please check the weaver execution. > > I'm sending some print screen to make it easier to understand. > > Anny help will be appreciated. > > Thanks. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Write once. Port to many. > Get the SDK and tools to simplify cross-platform app development. Create > new or port existing apps to sell to consumers worldwide. Explore the > Intel AppUpSM program developer opportunity. appdeveloper.intel.com/join > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-appdev > _______________________________________________ > floggy-user mailing list > flo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/floggy-user > > |
From: Thiago M. (timba) <thi...@fl...> - 2011-12-20 21:10:56
|
Hi Emanuele, This is the expected behavior. Why? Because only PPerson implements Persistable and this class does not have any field (public, protected or private). Best Thiago Moreira On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 9:16 AM, <Ema...@fi...> wrote: > Hi there, > > I'm using floggy 1.4.0 in a very simple j2me project. > > I have a j2me project, a web project and a "shared" project. In this > shared project i've two classes of the model object i need to persist. > > class Person { > private String name; > ... > } > class Address { > private String city; > ... > } > > These model classes does not implements Persistable because they are used > in my web project and i don't want to put mobile logic in a "shared" > library. > > So i added Persistable interface in an extension of the two classes in my > mobile project: > > class PPerson extends Person implements Persistable { > ... > } > class PAddress extends Address implements Persistable { > ... > } > > The save of PPerson or PAddress in my mobile prj works but when i try to > load them i have an empty object. > The number of elements saved is correct but the content of the object is > empty on all fields: person.name or address.city has null. > > Do i need to implements Persistable interface in my Person classes ? > > > Thanks for all the help, > Emanuele > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > RSA(R) Conference 2012 > Save $700 by Nov 18 > Register now > http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 > _______________________________________________ > floggy-user mailing list > flo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/floggy-user > > |
From: Thiago M. (timba) <thi...@fl...> - 2011-12-07 18:47:00
|
The behavior is 100% right! The PersonStore DB does not increase its size because you are using always the same instance (personStore) inside the loop. You are creating only the Person object not the PersonStore, got it? Best Thiago Moreira On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 6:13 AM, Samuel Stanley <sam...@gm...>wrote: > Hello, > > Thank you for your response. I do see that the ID returned is the same. > But the DB size increases on every save. For a better understanding > consider the following example: > > public class PersonStore implements Persistable { > > private Person person; > > public PersonStore() { > super(); > person = new Person(); > } > > public Person getPerson() { > return person; > } > > public void setPerson(Person person) { > this.person = person; > } > } > > The person object consists of the following fields: > > > *private String name; > private String middleName; > private String lastName;* > > on clicking save i do the following: > > > for (int i = 0; i < 25; i++) { > Person person=new Person(); > > person.setName("Norton"); > person.setLastName("Stanley"); > personStore.setPerson(person); > int id= persistanceService.save(personStore); > System.out.println("Value of i for: "+i+" "+id); > } > > My save method: > > * *public int save(Persistable mobileObject) { > int returnValue=-111; > try { > > > returnValue=PersistableManager.getInstance().save(mobileObject); > > } catch (FloggyException ex) { > ex.printStackTrace(); > } > return returnValue; > } > > On saving the person store object i notice that the size of the DB file > created for the PersonStore object is always the same but the size of the > DB file created for the Person object increases everytime a new person > object is created, though i am replacing the reference held by the > PersonStore object. Could you kindly throw some light on this behavior? > > Thanking you, > Regards, > S.A.Norton Stanley > > > On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 10:24 AM, Mr Carlos Bernardo < > car...@ya...> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> all objects created calling new receives a unique ID after save >> operation. So, you are not overwritten in the loop. But, removing new >> allow you overwritten the same object 25 times. Try to print the ID as in >> the example below. >> >> public void save(Persistable mobileObject) { >> try { >> >> PersistableManager.getInstance().save(mobileObject); >> >> System. >> *out*.println("id: " + PersistableManager.*getInstance*().getId(mobileObject) >> + "Name: " + mobileObject.getname); >> >> >> } catch (FloggyException ex) { >> ex.printStackTrace(); >> } >> } >> >> *From:* Samuel Stanley <sam...@gm...> >> *To:* Thiago Moreira (timba) <thi...@fl...> >> *Cc:* flo...@li... >> *Sent:* Tuesday, December 6, 2011 11:40 PM >> *Subject:* Re: [floggy-user] Persisting Objects increases the DB Size >> >> Hi Thiago, >> >> Thank you for your response. When i create a new object and persist is >> should it not be replacing the previous instance of the object which is >> already persisted? Why should the size of the DB increase in this case? >> >> Thanking you, >> Regards, >> S.A.Norton Stanley. >> >> On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 12:41 AM, Thiago Moreira (timba) < >> thi...@fl...> wrote: >> >> Hi Samuel, >> >> Since you are using the same reference you are only updating the same >> Person object. >> >> Best >> >> Thiago Moreira >> >> >> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 11:31 PM, Samuel Stanley < >> sam...@gm...> wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> I have a class called Person with the following attributes: >> >> *private String name; >> private String middleName; >> private String lastName;* >> >> I persist this object when i click on Save command. The action that is >> performed is as below: >> >> * new Thread(new Runnable() { >> >> public void run() { >> >> for (int i = 0; i < 25; i++) { >> >> person = new Person(); >> >> person.setName("Norton"); >> >> person.setLastName("Stanley"); >> >> save(person); >> >> } >> } >> }).start();* >> >> My save Method: >> >> * public void save(Persistable mobileObject) { >> try { >> >> PersistableManager.getInstance().save(mobileObject); >> >> } catch (FloggyException ex) { >> ex.printStackTrace(); >> } >> }* >> >> When i run the project on Sun WTK i notice that the DB files increase in >> size by almost 1kb every time i click on Save. >> Now when i use the same reference of the Person object in the for loop >> above (i.e i do not call person = new Person(); each time) the size of the >> db remains the same and does not increase. Why is this behaviour? Can >> someone kindly throw some light on this? >> >> >> Thanking you, >> Regards, >> S.A.Norton Stanley >> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Cloud Services Checklist: Pricing and Packaging Optimization >> This white paper is intended to serve as a reference, checklist and point >> of >> discussion for anyone considering optimizing the pricing and packaging >> model >> of a cloud services business. Read Now! >> http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51491232/ >> _______________________________________________ >> floggy-user mailing list >> flo...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/floggy-user >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Cloud Services Checklist: Pricing and Packaging Optimization >> This white paper is intended to serve as a reference, checklist and point >> of >> discussion for anyone considering optimizing the pricing and packaging >> model >> of a cloud services business. Read Now! >> http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51491232/ >> _______________________________________________ >> floggy-user mailing list >> flo...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/floggy-user >> >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Cloud Services Checklist: Pricing and Packaging Optimization > This white paper is intended to serve as a reference, checklist and point > of > discussion for anyone considering optimizing the pricing and packaging > model > of a cloud services business. Read Now! > http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51491232/ > _______________________________________________ > floggy-user mailing list > flo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/floggy-user > > |
From: Samuel S. <sam...@gm...> - 2011-12-07 14:13:56
|
Hello, Thank you for your response. I do see that the ID returned is the same. But the DB size increases on every save. For a better understanding consider the following example: public class PersonStore implements Persistable { private Person person; public PersonStore() { super(); person = new Person(); } public Person getPerson() { return person; } public void setPerson(Person person) { this.person = person; } } The person object consists of the following fields: *private String name; private String middleName; private String lastName;* on clicking save i do the following: for (int i = 0; i < 25; i++) { Person person=new Person(); person.setName("Norton"); person.setLastName("Stanley"); personStore.setPerson(person); int id= persistanceService.save(personStore); System.out.println("Value of i for: "+i+" "+id); } My save method: * *public int save(Persistable mobileObject) { int returnValue=-111; try { returnValue=PersistableManager.getInstance().save(mobileObject); } catch (FloggyException ex) { ex.printStackTrace(); } return returnValue; } On saving the person store object i notice that the size of the DB file created for the PersonStore object is always the same but the size of the DB file created for the Person object increases everytime a new person object is created, though i am replacing the reference held by the PersonStore object. Could you kindly throw some light on this behavior? Thanking you, Regards, S.A.Norton Stanley On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 10:24 AM, Mr Carlos Bernardo <car...@ya... > wrote: > Hi, > > all objects created calling new receives a unique ID after save operation. > So, you are not overwritten in the loop. But, removing new allow you > overwritten the same object 25 times. Try to print the ID as in the example > below. > > public void save(Persistable mobileObject) { > try { > > PersistableManager.getInstance().save(mobileObject); > > System. > *out*.println("id: " + PersistableManager.*getInstance*().getId(mobileObject) > + "Name: " + mobileObject.getname); > > > } catch (FloggyException ex) { > ex.printStackTrace(); > } > } > > *From:* Samuel Stanley <sam...@gm...> > *To:* Thiago Moreira (timba) <thi...@fl...> > *Cc:* flo...@li... > *Sent:* Tuesday, December 6, 2011 11:40 PM > *Subject:* Re: [floggy-user] Persisting Objects increases the DB Size > > Hi Thiago, > > Thank you for your response. When i create a new object and persist is > should it not be replacing the previous instance of the object which is > already persisted? Why should the size of the DB increase in this case? > > Thanking you, > Regards, > S.A.Norton Stanley. > > On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 12:41 AM, Thiago Moreira (timba) < > thi...@fl...> wrote: > > Hi Samuel, > > Since you are using the same reference you are only updating the same > Person object. > > Best > > Thiago Moreira > > > On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 11:31 PM, Samuel Stanley <sam...@gm... > > wrote: > > Hello, > > I have a class called Person with the following attributes: > > *private String name; > private String middleName; > private String lastName;* > > I persist this object when i click on Save command. The action that is > performed is as below: > > * new Thread(new Runnable() { > > public void run() { > > for (int i = 0; i < 25; i++) { > > person = new Person(); > > person.setName("Norton"); > > person.setLastName("Stanley"); > > save(person); > > } > } > }).start();* > > My save Method: > > * public void save(Persistable mobileObject) { > try { > > PersistableManager.getInstance().save(mobileObject); > > } catch (FloggyException ex) { > ex.printStackTrace(); > } > }* > > When i run the project on Sun WTK i notice that the DB files increase in > size by almost 1kb every time i click on Save. > Now when i use the same reference of the Person object in the for loop > above (i.e i do not call person = new Person(); each time) the size of the > db remains the same and does not increase. Why is this behaviour? Can > someone kindly throw some light on this? > > > Thanking you, > Regards, > S.A.Norton Stanley > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Cloud Services Checklist: Pricing and Packaging Optimization > This white paper is intended to serve as a reference, checklist and point > of > discussion for anyone considering optimizing the pricing and packaging > model > of a cloud services business. Read Now! > http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51491232/ > _______________________________________________ > floggy-user mailing list > flo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/floggy-user > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Cloud Services Checklist: Pricing and Packaging Optimization > This white paper is intended to serve as a reference, checklist and point > of > discussion for anyone considering optimizing the pricing and packaging > model > of a cloud services business. Read Now! > http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51491232/ > _______________________________________________ > floggy-user mailing list > flo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/floggy-user > > |
From: Mr C. B. <car...@ya...> - 2011-12-07 04:54:59
|
Hi, all objects created calling new receives a unique ID after save operation. So, you are not overwritten in the loop. But, removing new allow you overwritten the same object 25 times. Try to print the ID as in the example below. public void save(Persistable mobileObject) { try { PersistableManager.getInstance().save(mobileObject); System.out.println("id: " + PersistableManager.getInstance().getId(mobileObject) + "Name: " + mobileObject.getname); From: Samuel Stanley <sam...@gm...> To: Thiago Moreira (timba) <thi...@fl...> Cc: flo...@li... Sent: Tuesday, December 6, 2011 11:40 PM Subject: Re: [floggy-user] Persisting Objects increases the DB Size Hi Thiago, Thank you for your response. When i create a new object and persist is should it not be replacing the previous instance of the object which is already persisted? Why should the size of the DB increase in this case? Thanking you, Regards, S.A.Norton Stanley. On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 12:41 AM, Thiago Moreira (timba) <thi...@fl...> wrote: Hi Samuel, > > > Since you are using the same reference you are only updating the same Person object. > > > Best > > > Thiago Moreira > > > >On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 11:31 PM, Samuel Stanley <sam...@gm...> wrote: > >Hello, >> >>I have a class called Person with the following attributes: >> >> private String name; >> private String middleName; >> private String lastName; >> >>I persist this object when i click on Save command. The action that is performed is as below: >> >> new Thread(new Runnable() { >> >> public void run() { >> >> for (int i = 0; i < 25; i++) { >> >> person = new Person(); >> >> person.setName("Norton"); >> >> person.setLastName("Stanley"); >> >> save(person); >> >> } >> } >> }).start(); >> >>My save Method: >> >> public void save(Persistable mobileObject) { >> try { >> >> PersistableManager.getInstance().save(mobileObject); >> >> } catch (FloggyException ex) { >> ex.printStackTrace(); >> } >> } >> >>When i run the project on Sun WTK i notice that the DB files increase in size by almost 1kb every time i click on Save. >>Now when i use the same reference of the Person object in the for loop above (i.e i do not call person = new Person(); each time) the size of the db remains the same and does not increase. Why is this behaviour? Can someone kindly throw some light on this? >> >> >>Thanking you, >>Regards, >>S.A.Norton Stanley >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Cloud Services Checklist: Pricing and Packaging Optimization This white paper is intended to serve as a reference, checklist and point of discussion for anyone considering optimizing the pricing and packaging model of a cloud services business. Read Now! http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51491232/ _______________________________________________ floggy-user mailing list flo...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/floggy-user } catch (FloggyException ex) { ex.printStackTrace(); } } |
From: Samuel S. <sam...@gm...> - 2011-12-07 03:41:03
|
Hi Thiago, Thank you for your response. When i create a new object and persist is should it not be replacing the previous instance of the object which is already persisted? Why should the size of the DB increase in this case? Thanking you, Regards, S.A.Norton Stanley. On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 12:41 AM, Thiago Moreira (timba) < thi...@fl...> wrote: > Hi Samuel, > > Since you are using the same reference you are only updating the same > Person object. > > Best > > Thiago Moreira > > > On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 11:31 PM, Samuel Stanley <sam...@gm...>wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I have a class called Person with the following attributes: >> >> *private String name; >> private String middleName; >> private String lastName;* >> >> I persist this object when i click on Save command. The action that is >> performed is as below: >> >> * new Thread(new Runnable() { >> >> public void run() { >> >> for (int i = 0; i < 25; i++) { >> >> person = new Person(); >> >> person.setName("Norton"); >> >> person.setLastName("Stanley"); >> >> save(person); >> >> } >> } >> }).start();* >> >> My save Method: >> >> * public void save(Persistable mobileObject) { >> try { >> >> PersistableManager.getInstance().save(mobileObject); >> >> } catch (FloggyException ex) { >> ex.printStackTrace(); >> } >> }* >> >> When i run the project on Sun WTK i notice that the DB files increase in >> size by almost 1kb every time i click on Save. >> Now when i use the same reference of the Person object in the for loop >> above (i.e i do not call person = new Person(); each time) the size of the >> db remains the same and does not increase. Why is this behaviour? Can >> someone kindly throw some light on this? >> >> >> Thanking you, >> Regards, >> S.A.Norton Stanley >> > > |
From: Thiago M. (timba) <thi...@fl...> - 2011-12-06 19:42:27
|
Hi Samuel, Since you are using the same reference you are only updating the same Person object. Best Thiago Moreira On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 11:31 PM, Samuel Stanley <sam...@gm...>wrote: > Hello, > > I have a class called Person with the following attributes: > > *private String name; > private String middleName; > private String lastName;* > > I persist this object when i click on Save command. The action that is > performed is as below: > > * new Thread(new Runnable() { > > public void run() { > > for (int i = 0; i < 25; i++) { > > person = new Person(); > > person.setName("Norton"); > > person.setLastName("Stanley"); > > save(person); > > } > } > }).start();* > > My save Method: > > * public void save(Persistable mobileObject) { > try { > > PersistableManager.getInstance().save(mobileObject); > > } catch (FloggyException ex) { > ex.printStackTrace(); > } > }* > > When i run the project on Sun WTK i notice that the DB files increase in > size by almost 1kb every time i click on Save. > Now when i use the same reference of the Person object in the for loop > above (i.e i do not call person = new Person(); each time) the size of the > db remains the same and does not increase. Why is this behaviour? Can > someone kindly throw some light on this? > > > Thanking you, > Regards, > S.A.Norton Stanley > |
From: Samuel S. <sam...@gm...> - 2011-12-06 07:31:55
|
Hello, I have a class called Person with the following attributes: *private String name; private String middleName; private String lastName;* I persist this object when i click on Save command. The action that is performed is as below: * new Thread(new Runnable() { public void run() { for (int i = 0; i < 25; i++) { person = new Person(); person.setName("Norton"); person.setLastName("Stanley"); save(person); } } }).start();* My save Method: * public void save(Persistable mobileObject) { try { PersistableManager.getInstance().save(mobileObject); } catch (FloggyException ex) { ex.printStackTrace(); } }* When i run the project on Sun WTK i notice that the DB files increase in size by almost 1kb every time i click on Save. Now when i use the same reference of the Person object in the for loop above (i.e i do not call person = new Person(); each time) the size of the db remains the same and does not increase. Why is this behaviour? Can someone kindly throw some light on this? Thanking you, Regards, S.A.Norton Stanley |
From: Thiago M. (timba) <thi...@fl...> - 2011-11-26 20:13:33
|
Bom tarde Gilberto, Você já tentou a documentação http://floggy.sourceforge.net/configuration/netbeans.html ? Thiago Moreira 2011/11/25 Gilberto Soares <gi...@ho...> > ** > bom dia, como usar o floggy no netbeans 7 ? > > att. > Gilberto > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure > contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, > security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this > data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d > _______________________________________________ > floggy-user mailing list > flo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/floggy-user > > |
From: Gilberto S. <gi...@ho...> - 2011-11-25 13:26:38
|
bom dia, como usar o floggy no netbeans 7 ? att. Gilberto |
From: Vicente <vic...@so...> - 2011-11-10 16:41:45
|
Hi! I've developed a script to import a lot of data in several recordstores. My script is launched when app starts but previously I would like to check if those recordstores already exists in order to control that recordstores created doens't create again. I know when we are working with floggy frameworks it create a file wich name is: run_by_class_storage_#Floggy#Properties.db and it contains our database schemas among other things. Maybe we can get acces to that file? How can I check if Recordstores already exists from code? Thank you! |
From: Vicente M. M. <vic...@so...> - 2011-11-09 14:12:14
|
El 08/11/2011 17:30, Vicente Montaño Mena escribió: > Hi! > > I've found a problem working with insert and load method. i'm going to > describe it: > > I've found floggy works with _id attribute which is used to load > method to search registers in recordstore and I've found that insert > method make and unique id (_id) for both element saved. > > I've been using my own id attibute too ¿Is this a mistake? > > I think it is posible because my database have several recordstores > which his first records id is > 1 (cause because I've executed a > script to import all my data in recordstore to start my application > with an initial database). So, when I execute that code: > > // Recordstore which first records id = 4 > int id = 4; > Persistable elem = new Persistable(); > boolean lazy = false; > > pm.load( elem, id, lazy); > > it gets me 4st records instead 1st because load method search by _id > and not search by mi id attribute. In order to resolve it I've develop > my own filter (class which implements > net.sourceforge.floggy.persistence.Filter) to compare by my Id field. > > a bit freak: > > if ( mysolution == the_only_solution) { > Syso( "To change it in a future" ); > } else { > Syso( "What is the right way?" ); > } > > Thank you! Maybe, 'IDable' Interface is my solution, isn't it? |
From: Thiago M. (timba) <thi...@fl...> - 2011-11-08 17:10:23
|
Hi Vicente, If your IDs come from a different data source you should add a new field for your Persistable classes to reference it, and yes, you should build a Filter class to retrieve it from the repository. Best Thiago Moreira On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 2:30 PM, Vicente Montaño Mena < vic...@so...> wrote: > Hi! > > I've found a problem working with insert and load method. i'm going to > describe it: > > I've found floggy works with _id attribute which is used to load method to > search registers in recordstore and I've found that insert method make and > unique id (_id) for both element saved. > > I've been using my own id attibute too ¿Is this a mistake? > > I think it is posible because my database have several recordstores which > his first records id is > 1 (cause because I've executed a script to import > all my data in recordstore to start my application with an initial > database). So, when I execute that code: > > // Recordstore which first records id = 4 > int id = 4; > Persistable elem = new Persistable(); > boolean lazy = false; > > pm.load( elem, id, lazy); > > it gets me 4st records instead 1st because load method search by _id and > not search by mi id attribute. In order to resolve it I've develop my own > filter (class which implements net.sourceforge.floggy.persistence.Filter) > to compare by my Id field. > > a bit freak: > > if ( mysolution == the_only_solution) { > Syso( "To change it in a future" ); > } else { > Syso( "What is the right way?" ); > } > > Thank you! > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > RSA(R) Conference 2012 > Save $700 by Nov 18 > Register now > http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 > _______________________________________________ > floggy-user mailing list > flo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/floggy-user > > |
From: Thiago M. (timba) <thi...@fl...> - 2011-11-08 16:49:28
|
Hi Vicente, It is responsibility of the WTK to save the RecordStores in the hard disk, Floggy is unaware of where this will be saved. Best Thiago Moreira On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Vicente Montaño Mena < vic...@so...> wrote: > Hi! > > Normally my RecordStoresfiles are created in > USER_HOME\j2mewtk\VERSION\appdb\DEVICE folder but since I deleted this > files they are being created in > USER_HOME\j2mewtk\VERSION\appdb\temp.DEVICENUMBER folder. > > And when I execute pm.deleteAll(MY_CLASS.class); method It doesn't works > (maybe because it doesn't find my Recordstore files?) > > Anyone know's something about this? > > Thank you > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > RSA(R) Conference 2012 > Save $700 by Nov 18 > Register now > http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 > _______________________________________________ > floggy-user mailing list > flo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/floggy-user > |
From: Vicente M. M. <vic...@so...> - 2011-11-08 16:30:47
|
Hi! I've found a problem working with insert and load method. i'm going to describe it: I've found floggy works with _id attribute which is used to load method to search registers in recordstore and I've found that insert method make and unique id (_id) for both element saved. I've been using my own id attibute too ¿Is this a mistake? I think it is posible because my database have several recordstores which his first records id is > 1 (cause because I've executed a script to import all my data in recordstore to start my application with an initial database). So, when I execute that code: // Recordstore which first records id = 4 int id = 4; Persistable elem = new Persistable(); boolean lazy = false; pm.load( elem, id, lazy); it gets me 4st records instead 1st because load method search by _id and not search by mi id attribute. In order to resolve it I've develop my own filter (class which implements net.sourceforge.floggy.persistence.Filter) to compare by my Id field. a bit freak: if ( mysolution == the_only_solution) { Syso( "To change it in a future" ); } else { Syso( "What is the right way?" ); } Thank you! |
From: Vicente M. M. <vic...@so...> - 2011-11-07 16:39:41
|
Hi! Normally my RecordStoresfiles are created in USER_HOME\j2mewtk\VERSION\appdb\DEVICE folder but since I deleted this files they are being created in USER_HOME\j2mewtk\VERSION\appdb\temp.DEVICENUMBER folder. And when I execute pm.deleteAll(MY_CLASS.class); method It doesn't works (maybe because it doesn't find my Recordstore files?) Anyone know's something about this? Thank you |