From: Erik H. <er...@eh...> - 2013-02-27 11:27:18
|
On 02/27/2013 12:17 PM, BARANGER Emmanuel wrote: > Le 27/02/2013 11:45, fli...@li... a > écrit : >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 15 >> Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 07:42:19 +0000 >> From: Renk Thorsten<tho...@jy...> >> Subject: [Flightgear-devel] FG vs. FSX demo >> To: FlightGear developers discussions >> <fli...@li...> >> Message-ID:<E49...@mb...> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" >> >> >> 4) FDMs >> >> * I've tried the ultralight, the twin-prop Baron and the Learjet. As far as I could tell, they handled just the same, the only difference i noticed was the airspeed I could get out of them. It's just no comparison at all to our JSBSim beauties like the SenecaII or the P-51D where the FDM feels even the torque from spinning up the engine. The FSX experience reminded me of badly tuned YaSIm models - it sort of gets the rough characteristics right, but that's about all. > How can you say such nonsense without anyone to react ? > > Obviously compare the worst YASim with the best JSBSim will always be > beneficial for JSBSim. But the opposite will be benefit YASim. This is > ridiculous. This was not a comparison between YASim and JSBSim, we all know both have their strengths and weaknesses. It was a comparison between a badly tuned YASim model and normal FSX behaviour. So even there YASim beats FSX when the YASim models is properly tuned. Erik -- http://www.adalin.com - Hardware accelerated AeonWave and OpenAL for Windows and Linux |