Re: [Flightgear-flightmodel] Quality of the aircraft

[Arnt K. <ar...@c2...>]

On Sun, 29 May 2011 18:20:59 -0430, Jose wrote in message 
<BAN...@ma...>:

> Greetings.
> 
> I've been seeing, the textures of the Cessna 172, and the whole plane,

..flightgear-flightmodel is a list to develop etc the flight dynamics
models (FDM), which decides "how it moves" and not "how it looks."  

..the exception to my rule above is when the FDM is run too slow, 
the modeled aircraft will more or less visibly oscillate between 
2 different positions or attitudes.

..but let's stay here until we know this is a flightgear developed 
bug, or an upstream bug, or an user's usage issue.

> but especially the 2D Panel. Model quality in execution time is not
> very good. But I see the textures and are of good quality, even I am
> redesigning some in the style of x-plane and the like. As I finish I
> can improve a model, for example the Cessna 172?. Since there are, for
> example, smooth edges, improving the quality of the cockpit. What
> rendering engine used fgfs?. We can change the quality of the models?.
> 
> Here is a picture that shows about what I say.
> http://flic.kr/p/9Name8

..if this is a genuine flightgear screen shot, how exactly 
did you manage to get it????? 

..oscillating between the 2D and the 3D panel is one of the 
things in FG that I am 100% sure of should _not_ happen.

..fgfs commandline used, which video card, which video driver, 
which operating system, which version, which cpu, ram etc.


-- 
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt Karlsen
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
  Scenarios always come in sets of three: 
  best case, worst case, and just in case.