From: Hans F. <fu...@gm...> - 2007-07-24 14:15:55
|
On 7/24/07, Melchior FRANZ <mf...@ao...> wrote: > * Hans Fugal -- Tuesday 24 July 2007: > > He didn't have an argument. He had a solution > > Yeah, but what annoys me is that it's a solution that is in fact about > turning fgfs into shared libs, but disguised as a solution for (allegedly) > "responsible" developers. The former is a rather big change, the latter > is only cosmetics. Again, having three binaries now is perfectly viable. > It's just a couple of MB more, which just isn't a problem. I'm sorry, I didn't catch your true objections in the first email. > > > What doesn't yet work in osgviewer is: > > > And it crashes in OS X. > > Must have missed the bug report ... I don't think I've reported it yet. A bad bug report is worse than none at all. But I do plan to get to it soon. -- Hans Fugal Fugal Computing |