Another approach could be the use of multiple UV layers, like other game engines, err, scenegraphs use. One base texture, and one or more uv layers for decals, with the possibility to define in the material properties if a texture repeats or not. the limit here is posed by the use of a model format that is more limited than what the scenegraph is capable of. I am not saying that FGFS should not use the AC3D format, but since it already extends it, for example adding a format for animating sub-meshes, it ought to be possible to do the same to add support for this sort of features, along with vertex weights and skeletal systems for example.


Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 15:53:32 +0400
From: tomash.brechko@gmail.com
To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Mipmapping of liveries

Also the question to GPU gurus: I think most aircrafts that have hi-res liveries do so because of several small signs here and there.  So does it makes sense to have a lo-res opaque texture that paints aircraft's body, and then a hi-res transparent one that places signs on top of the first?  This way hi-res texture will be mostly "empty" - will it substantially improve GPU cycles and memory usage?


--
  Tomash Brechko

------------------------------------------------------------------------------ October Webinars: Code for Performance Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60133471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel