Re: [Flickrfs-users] Usage Survey
Brought to you by:
manishrjain
From: Carlos M. <car...@el...> - 2008-01-30 02:58:29
|
On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 21:46 -0500, rdm...@bi... wrote: > On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 at 17:11, Carlos Moffat wrote: > > When I mount the flickrfs directory, it goes through the authorization > > successfully, a /sets and /tags directory is created, but they are not > > populated. > [...] > > fuse.__version__ > > '0.2-pre3' > > So I'm pretty sure your problem is the threading problem in fuse 0.2. > I haven't heard back from the fuse-python maintainer yet. > > Can you downgrade to fuse-python 0.1? > Well, I grabbed a previous version from Debian's snapshot server. The versioning was funny, but fuse.__version__ threw an exception so I'm guessing is 0.1. Anyways, it got stuck in the same place as the newer version. Carlos > I'm thinking maybe I could introduce a configurable 'sync' mode where > flickrfs wouldn't do anything in the background, to let people who are > stuck with fuse-python 0.2 at least be able to use flickrfs. > > --David |