From: Martin Q. <mar...@im...> - 2005-01-04 21:09:38
|
Hello, I come to you about the FlexML project you are member of. Me and a friend of mine (Arnaud, in CC) are very interested in this project and decided to partially base our academic project on flexml.=20 As you all know, there is some issues with the current version, such as the incompatibility with the newest versions of flex. The fact is that our locally hacked version does solve this issue. We browsed the bug list, and we think that we should be able to tackle some other bugs. This is why we would like to be given the cvs write right. The easiest for us would be if you could add both of us ('mquinson' and 'legranda') to the list of the developpers of the project. Of course, we will proceed carefully afterward and not trash anything (at least, not on purpose :). Pierre, at least you know me, I think you can speakup in my favor if you cannot do the work yourself... Thanks for your time, and for this neat tool. Mt. |
From: Kristoffer H R. <kri...@us...> - 2005-01-04 21:55:11
Attachments:
smime.p7s
|
Dear Arnaud and Martin, I've added you; I look forward to development starting again! Cheers, Kristoffer <kri...@us...> __ Kristoffer H Rose, Ph.D. <kri...@us...> +1(914)784-7642 (fax 6324) IBM T. J. Watson Research Center, PO Box 704, Yorktown Heights, NY 10598 |
From: Martin Q. <mar...@im...> - 2005-01-05 19:52:21
|
Dear Kristoffer, I would like to create a new list to which cvs commit messages could be sent. Unfortunately, I cannot do so because you gave us the developer status within the project. As I understand things, you don't have that much time to devote to flexml and I would like not to rely on you for such tasks. That's why I would appreciate if you could give me the administrator status within the project, please ? Thanks in advance, Mt. On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 04:53:20PM -0500, Kristoffer H Rose wrote: > Dear Arnaud and Martin, >=20 > I've added you; I look forward to development starting again! >=20 > Cheers, > Kristoffer <kri...@us...> >=20 > __ > Kristoffer H Rose, Ph.D. <kri...@us...> +1(914)784-7642 (fax 6324) > IBM T. J. Watson Research Center, PO Box 704, Yorktown Heights, NY 10598 >=20 |
From: Kristoffer H R. <kri...@us...> - 2005-01-05 20:39:35
Attachments:
smime.p7s
|
I have made you administrator...are any of you also debian developers or would you prefer if I upload flexml to debian myself? Cheers, Kristoffer __ Kristoffer H Rose, Ph.D. <kri...@us...> +1(914)784-7642 (fax 6324) IBM T. J. Watson Research Center, PO Box 704, Yorktown Heights, NY 10598 |
From: Arnaud L. <Arn...@im...> - 2005-01-05 20:45:47
|
Today Kritoffer wrote: > I have made you administrator...are any of you also debian developers or > would you prefer if I upload flexml to debian myself? Martin is a debian developer. So I think he'll take care of everything with migus from now on. Cheers, Arnaud -- Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it. -- D.E.Knuth |
From: Kristoffer H R. <kri...@us...> - 2005-01-06 02:39:34
Attachments:
smime.p7s
|
No problem. I am actually the maintainer of the debian package so keep me posted. :) __ Kristoffer H Rose, Ph.D. <kri...@us...> +1(914)784-7642 (fax 6324) IBM T. J. Watson Research Center, PO Box 704, Yorktown Heights, NY 10598 |
From: Martin Q. <mar...@im...> - 2005-01-06 19:41:18
|
[Both Arnaud and I are on -users, now -- at least -- cutting CC] On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 09:38:37PM -0500, Kristoffer H Rose wrote: > No problem. I am actually the maintainer of the debian package so keep m= e=20 > posted. :) OOoops, sorry, I was sure that Pierre took over the maintainanceship last summer, that's why I didn't spoke about that with you. Sorry. Would you mind if I upload a new version containing the recent changes, adding myself to the uploaders? Or maybe you prefer me to take over the maintainanceship? [I don't really care] Thanks for your time,=20 Mt. |
From: Pierre M. <pma...@de...> - 2005-01-04 22:10:02
|
Hi guys, On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 10:07:06PM +0100, Martin Quinson wrote: > Hello, >=20 > I come to you about the FlexML project you are member of. Me and a friend= of > mine (Arnaud, in CC) are very interested in this project and decided to > partially base our academic project on flexml.=20 >=20 > As you all know, there is some issues with the current version, such as t= he > incompatibility with the newest versions of flex. The fact is that our > locally hacked version does solve this issue. We browsed the bug list, and > we think that we should be able to tackle some other bugs. I am very pleased that you worked on flexml. I worked on it last summer, but unfortunately I had not the time to enhance it. > This is why we would like to be given the cvs write right. The easiest for > us would be if you could add both of us ('mquinson' and 'legranda') to the > list of the developpers of the project. Of course, we will proceed carefu= lly > afterward and not trash anything (at least, not on purpose :). >=20 > Pierre, at least you know me, I think you can speakup in my favor if you > cannot do the work yourself... Of course I am very pleased to help you. Martin and Arnaud are wonderful. I think that you already have write access to the cvsroot. I would like to wish everybody an happy new year.=20 Thanks a lot, --=20 Pierre Machard <pma...@de...> http://debian.org GPG: 1024D/23706F87 : B906 A53F 84E0 49B6 6CF7 82C2 B3A0 2D66 2370 6F87 |
From: Arnaud L. <Arn...@im...> - 2005-01-05 19:32:52
|
Hello, I have just finished committing my modifications. I have updated the debian changelog accordingly. Feel free to check my modifications from the CVS (they are much more detailed as I did them step by step so that everybody can easily check) before publishing it. flexml (1-6.2) unstable; urgency=low * Fix a few bugs and make gcc happy. * Make flexml work with the current flex (closes: #192692, #192243). * Change the build-dep to flex and make lintian happy. -- Arnaud Legrand <Arn...@im...> Wed, 5 Jan 2005 10:27:58 -0800 Migus, I let you close #192692 and #192243 by yourself. Cheers, Arnaud Legrand -- Failure is not an option. It comes bundled with software. |
From: Martin Q. <mar...@im...> - 2005-01-06 19:47:12
|
[answer to a public list with Will's agreement] On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 02:30:25PM -0500, William F. Dowling wrote: > I am on the flexml-users mailing list. >=20 > I have not checked in all the changes to flexml that I am currently > using. In particular, I have not checked in changes to the skeleton > file (since that is user-specifiable anyway). These changes include >=20 > - replacement of 'new' identifier so flexml-generated code compiles > under C++ >=20 > - modifiy logic weakly so 'flex scanner jammed' cannot occur. >=20 > - some new error message control >=20 > - modification so multiple calls to flexml-generated scanner work. >=20 > - (I think I made a mod so flexml-generated code is OK for current flex > rev; but I'm not sure because I had to downgrade to old flex for > independent reasons.) >=20 > BTW with the mods I have made I am using a flexml-generated scanner in a > production environment.) Let's work together because I think flexml is a > great tool and it's too bad that it has sort of languished. =20 >=20 > Will Hello, those changes all look good. I hope you will find the time to commit them, so that we all can get them. At the first glance, there is no dupplicate work with Arnaud's last changes, which is a good news :) I also think that flexml is too neat to die slowly the way it used to do, and I'm very happy to see that we are one more around flexml. Thanks for your time, Mt. |