From: Jason K. <jak...@mo...> - 2004-09-29 00:04:27
|
Ok, I'll get on the ball this week and install a new virtual server on my computer here for just FlexCP.. I'll be able to play with it a lot more. Anyone suggest a Linux distro we are focusing on? I personally use Slack. Thanks, Jay . > -----Original Message----- > From: fle...@li... [mailto:flexcp-devel- > ad...@li...] On Behalf Of Dennis Bollyn > Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2004 11:12 AM > To: fle...@li... > Subject: RE: [FlexCP-devel] FlexCP + Web-CP integration > > I'm willing to take a look at the code, but I have to re-install linux > first. The harddisk that > had linux on it crashed completely. After I get that going, I'm willing to > invest some time in > that. It seems that that's the main delay right now. If we get that sorted > out, adding additional > modules will be easier. > > A while back there was some discussion on ACL, how far is that? > > --- Jonathan Haskins <jha...@ki...> wrote: > > > The cvs semi works right now but it does not handle a > > disconnect/reconnect situation correctly right now. It's usable but > > after awhile it will time out (as it should) and when you reload for the > > first time it fails to recognize it's been disconnected and comes up > > with errors about not being able to talk to the server. > > > > On Mon, 2004-09-27 at 21:32 -0400, Jason Kendall wrote: > > > John, If you can get something started that semi works, I wouldn't > mind > > > working towards making it rock solid. Or at least a RFC that relates > to > > > that communication, and where you where heading with it so we can pull > > > it all together. > > > > > > . > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: fle...@li... [mailto:flexcp-devel- > > > > ad...@li...] On Behalf Of Jonathan Haskins > > > > Sent: Monday, September 27, 2004 9:18 PM > > > > To: fle...@li... > > > > Subject: Re: [FlexCP-devel] FlexCP + Web-CP integration > > > > > > > > The web://cp code base has problems though, we already discussed > using > > > > it for the base for flexcp and it was voted not to. So if we throw > out > > > > the flexcp code which is newer and better than the webcp code we > would > > > > actually be taking a step back. We would still have to rewrite the > > > > portions dealing with multi-server, modules, and virtual users. > > > > > > > > Now admittedly webcp is further along than flexcp, but that is > because > > > > it is simpler in it's current stat. webcp cannot easily be taken any > > > > further without almost a complete rewrite anyway. flexcp was started > > > > from the beginning to be flexible, and as a result of that it is > more > > > > complicated to program it. > > > > > > > > What we really need is for someone to take the 20 hours or so that > is > > > > needed, and complete the work I started on the socket code between > the > > > > front end and backend. Make it rock solid so we can work on other > > > things > > > > which will share more common code with the webcp code base. Maybe I > > > > might take another shot at it but I have to say I've already put > lots > > > of > > > > time coding and trouble shooting into that section so I don't feel > > > much > > > > incentive at this point. > > > > > > > > On Mon, 2004-09-27 at 17:23 -0500, j@ckrabbit wrote: > > > > > I wanted to throw an idea out there for integrating the Web-CP and > > > > > FlexCP hosting control panel projects. It would go something like > > > this: > > > > > > > > > > 1. Web-cp would be renamed to FlexCP. All development work for > > > both > > > > > projects would be done under the FlexCP banner. > > > > > 2. FlexCP Version 1.0 would basically be just a final release of > > > Web-CP > > > > > (if it can ever get to that point). So beginning now the next > > > release > > > > > of web-cp would actually be FlexCP 0.5.4 then FlexCP 0.6.0 etc., > > > etc. > > > > > 3. Development work for FlexCP 2.0 would begin with the coding on > > > > > FlexCP done to date and would continue to be worked on > concurrently > > > with > > > > > FlexCP 0.x-1.0.x. It's first release could be something like > 2.0.1. > > > > > > > > > > Basically this idea would be something akin to the direction that > > > the > > > > > Apache project has taken with its 1.x and 2.0.x projects. > > > > > > > > > > What do people think... Pros ??? Cons ??? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 > > > > > Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your > judgement > > > on > > > > > who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. > > > > > Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > flexcp-devel mailing list > > > > > fle...@li... > > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 > > > > Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement > > > on > > > > who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. > > > > Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > flexcp-devel mailing list > > > > fle...@li... > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 > > > Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement > on > > > who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. > > > Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php > > > _______________________________________________ > > > flexcp-devel mailing list > > > fle...@li... > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 > > Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on > > who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. > > Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php > > _______________________________________________ > > flexcp-devel mailing list > > fle...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > > > > > ===== > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 > Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on > who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. > Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php > _______________________________________________ > flexcp-devel mailing list > fle...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel |