From: Jonathan H. <jha...@ki...> - 2004-09-28 02:20:08
|
I kinda read that wrong, I see now that j@ckrabbit meant flexcp 2.0 would be based on the current flexcp codebase. I have no problem with that but I kinda think our time would be better spent working on flexcp rather than maintaining a webcp/flexcp .5/1.0. Anyway, disregard my last message, I personally have no preference as far as this is concerned. On Mon, 2004-09-27 at 18:22 -0700, Jonathan Haskins wrote: > The web://cp code base has problems though, we already discussed using > it for the base for flexcp and it was voted not to. So if we throw out > the flexcp code which is newer and better than the webcp code we would > actually be taking a step back. We would still have to rewrite the > portions dealing with multi-server, modules, and virtual users. > > Now admittedly webcp is further along than flexcp, but that is because > it is simpler in it's current stat. webcp cannot easily be taken any > further without almost a complete rewrite anyway. flexcp was started > from the beginning to be flexible, and as a result of that it is more > complicated to program it. > > What we really need is for someone to take the 20 hours or so that is > needed, and complete the work I started on the socket code between the > front end and backend. Make it rock solid so we can work on other things > which will share more common code with the webcp code base. Maybe I > might take another shot at it but I have to say I've already put lots of > time coding and trouble shooting into that section so I don't feel much > incentive at this point. > > On Mon, 2004-09-27 at 17:23 -0500, j@ckrabbit wrote: > > I wanted to throw an idea out there for integrating the Web-CP and > > FlexCP hosting control panel projects. It would go something like this: > > > > 1. Web-cp would be renamed to FlexCP. All development work for both > > projects would be done under the FlexCP banner. > > 2. FlexCP Version 1.0 would basically be just a final release of Web-CP > > (if it can ever get to that point). So beginning now the next release > > of web-cp would actually be FlexCP 0.5.4 then FlexCP 0.6.0 etc., etc. > > 3. Development work for FlexCP 2.0 would begin with the coding on > > FlexCP done to date and would continue to be worked on concurrently with > > FlexCP 0.x-1.0.x. It's first release could be something like 2.0.1. > > > > Basically this idea would be something akin to the direction that the > > Apache project has taken with its 1.x and 2.0.x projects. > > > > What do people think... Pros ??? Cons ??? > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 > > Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on > > who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. > > Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php > > _______________________________________________ > > flexcp-devel mailing list > > fle...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 > Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on > who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. > Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php > _______________________________________________ > flexcp-devel mailing list > fle...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > > |