Menu
▾
▴
flexcp-devel
|
From: <j...@ck...> - 2004-09-28 00:24:53
|
I wanted to throw an idea out there for integrating the Web-CP and FlexCP hosting control panel projects. It would go something like this: 1. Web-cp would be renamed to FlexCP. All development work for both projects would be done under the FlexCP banner. 2. FlexCP Version 1.0 would basically be just a final release of Web-CP (if it can ever get to that point). So beginning now the next release of web-cp would actually be FlexCP 0.5.4 then FlexCP 0.6.0 etc., etc. 3. Development work for FlexCP 2.0 would begin with the coding on FlexCP done to date and would continue to be worked on concurrently with FlexCP 0.x-1.0.x. It's first release could be something like 2.0.1. Basically this idea would be something akin to the direction that the Apache project has taken with its 1.x and 2.0.x projects. What do people think... Pros ??? Cons ??? |
|
From: Jonathan H. <jon...@ki...> - 2004-09-28 01:18:12
|
The web://cp code base has problems though, we already discussed using it for the base for flexcp and it was voted not to. So if we throw out the flexcp code which is newer and better than the webcp code we would actually be taking a step back. We would still have to rewrite the portions dealing with multi-server, modules, and virtual users. Now admittedly webcp is further along than flexcp, but that is because it is simpler in it's current stat. webcp cannot easily be taken any further without almost a complete rewrite anyway. flexcp was started from the beginning to be flexible, and as a result of that it is more complicated to program it. What we really need is for someone to take the 20 hours or so that is needed, and complete the work I started on the socket code between the front end and backend. Make it rock solid so we can work on other things which will share more common code with the webcp code base. Maybe I might take another shot at it but I have to say I've already put lots of time coding and trouble shooting into that section so I don't feel much incentive at this point. On Mon, 2004-09-27 at 17:23 -0500, j@ckrabbit wrote: > I wanted to throw an idea out there for integrating the Web-CP and > FlexCP hosting control panel projects. It would go something like this: > > 1. Web-cp would be renamed to FlexCP. All development work for both > projects would be done under the FlexCP banner. > 2. FlexCP Version 1.0 would basically be just a final release of Web-CP > (if it can ever get to that point). So beginning now the next release > of web-cp would actually be FlexCP 0.5.4 then FlexCP 0.6.0 etc., etc. > 3. Development work for FlexCP 2.0 would begin with the coding on > FlexCP done to date and would continue to be worked on concurrently with > FlexCP 0.x-1.0.x. It's first release could be something like 2.0.1. > > Basically this idea would be something akin to the direction that the > Apache project has taken with its 1.x and 2.0.x projects. > > What do people think... Pros ??? Cons ??? > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 > Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on > who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. > Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php > _______________________________________________ > flexcp-devel mailing list > fle...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > > |
|
From: Jason K. <jak...@mo...> - 2004-09-28 01:32:19
|
John, If you can get something started that semi works, I wouldn't mind working towards making it rock solid. Or at least a RFC that relates to that communication, and where you where heading with it so we can pull it all together. . > -----Original Message----- > From: fle...@li... [mailto:flexcp-devel- > ad...@li...] On Behalf Of Jonathan Haskins > Sent: Monday, September 27, 2004 9:18 PM > To: fle...@li... > Subject: Re: [FlexCP-devel] FlexCP + Web-CP integration > > The web://cp code base has problems though, we already discussed using > it for the base for flexcp and it was voted not to. So if we throw out > the flexcp code which is newer and better than the webcp code we would > actually be taking a step back. We would still have to rewrite the > portions dealing with multi-server, modules, and virtual users. > > Now admittedly webcp is further along than flexcp, but that is because > it is simpler in it's current stat. webcp cannot easily be taken any > further without almost a complete rewrite anyway. flexcp was started > from the beginning to be flexible, and as a result of that it is more > complicated to program it. > > What we really need is for someone to take the 20 hours or so that is > needed, and complete the work I started on the socket code between the > front end and backend. Make it rock solid so we can work on other things > which will share more common code with the webcp code base. Maybe I > might take another shot at it but I have to say I've already put lots of > time coding and trouble shooting into that section so I don't feel much > incentive at this point. > > On Mon, 2004-09-27 at 17:23 -0500, j@ckrabbit wrote: > > I wanted to throw an idea out there for integrating the Web-CP and > > FlexCP hosting control panel projects. It would go something like this: > > > > 1. Web-cp would be renamed to FlexCP. All development work for both > > projects would be done under the FlexCP banner. > > 2. FlexCP Version 1.0 would basically be just a final release of Web-CP > > (if it can ever get to that point). So beginning now the next release > > of web-cp would actually be FlexCP 0.5.4 then FlexCP 0.6.0 etc., etc. > > 3. Development work for FlexCP 2.0 would begin with the coding on > > FlexCP done to date and would continue to be worked on concurrently with > > FlexCP 0.x-1.0.x. It's first release could be something like 2.0.1. > > > > Basically this idea would be something akin to the direction that the > > Apache project has taken with its 1.x and 2.0.x projects. > > > > What do people think... Pros ??? Cons ??? > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 > > Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on > > who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. > > Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php > > _______________________________________________ > > flexcp-devel mailing list > > fle...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 > Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on > who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. > Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php > _______________________________________________ > flexcp-devel mailing list > fle...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel |
|
From: Jonathan H. <jha...@ki...> - 2004-09-28 02:26:34
|
The cvs semi works right now but it does not handle a disconnect/reconnect situation correctly right now. It's usable but after awhile it will time out (as it should) and when you reload for the first time it fails to recognize it's been disconnected and comes up with errors about not being able to talk to the server. On Mon, 2004-09-27 at 21:32 -0400, Jason Kendall wrote: > John, If you can get something started that semi works, I wouldn't mind > working towards making it rock solid. Or at least a RFC that relates to > that communication, and where you where heading with it so we can pull > it all together. > > . > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: fle...@li... [mailto:flexcp-devel- > > ad...@li...] On Behalf Of Jonathan Haskins > > Sent: Monday, September 27, 2004 9:18 PM > > To: fle...@li... > > Subject: Re: [FlexCP-devel] FlexCP + Web-CP integration > > > > The web://cp code base has problems though, we already discussed using > > it for the base for flexcp and it was voted not to. So if we throw out > > the flexcp code which is newer and better than the webcp code we would > > actually be taking a step back. We would still have to rewrite the > > portions dealing with multi-server, modules, and virtual users. > > > > Now admittedly webcp is further along than flexcp, but that is because > > it is simpler in it's current stat. webcp cannot easily be taken any > > further without almost a complete rewrite anyway. flexcp was started > > from the beginning to be flexible, and as a result of that it is more > > complicated to program it. > > > > What we really need is for someone to take the 20 hours or so that is > > needed, and complete the work I started on the socket code between the > > front end and backend. Make it rock solid so we can work on other > things > > which will share more common code with the webcp code base. Maybe I > > might take another shot at it but I have to say I've already put lots > of > > time coding and trouble shooting into that section so I don't feel > much > > incentive at this point. > > > > On Mon, 2004-09-27 at 17:23 -0500, j@ckrabbit wrote: > > > I wanted to throw an idea out there for integrating the Web-CP and > > > FlexCP hosting control panel projects. It would go something like > this: > > > > > > 1. Web-cp would be renamed to FlexCP. All development work for > both > > > projects would be done under the FlexCP banner. > > > 2. FlexCP Version 1.0 would basically be just a final release of > Web-CP > > > (if it can ever get to that point). So beginning now the next > release > > > of web-cp would actually be FlexCP 0.5.4 then FlexCP 0.6.0 etc., > etc. > > > 3. Development work for FlexCP 2.0 would begin with the coding on > > > FlexCP done to date and would continue to be worked on concurrently > with > > > FlexCP 0.x-1.0.x. It's first release could be something like 2.0.1. > > > > > > Basically this idea would be something akin to the direction that > the > > > Apache project has taken with its 1.x and 2.0.x projects. > > > > > > What do people think... Pros ??? Cons ??? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 > > > Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement > on > > > who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. > > > Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php > > > _______________________________________________ > > > flexcp-devel mailing list > > > fle...@li... > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 > > Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement > on > > who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. > > Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php > > _______________________________________________ > > flexcp-devel mailing list > > fle...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 > Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on > who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. > Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php > _______________________________________________ > flexcp-devel mailing list > fle...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > > |
|
From: Dennis B. <gy...@ya...> - 2004-09-28 15:12:27
|
I'm willing to take a look at the code, but I have to re-install linux first. The harddisk that had linux on it crashed completely. After I get that going, I'm willing to invest some time in that. It seems that that's the main delay right now. If we get that sorted out, adding additional modules will be easier. A while back there was some discussion on ACL, how far is that? --- Jonathan Haskins <jha...@ki...> wrote: > The cvs semi works right now but it does not handle a > disconnect/reconnect situation correctly right now. It's usable but > after awhile it will time out (as it should) and when you reload for the > first time it fails to recognize it's been disconnected and comes up > with errors about not being able to talk to the server. > > On Mon, 2004-09-27 at 21:32 -0400, Jason Kendall wrote: > > John, If you can get something started that semi works, I wouldn't mind > > working towards making it rock solid. Or at least a RFC that relates to > > that communication, and where you where heading with it so we can pull > > it all together. > > > > . > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: fle...@li... [mailto:flexcp-devel- > > > ad...@li...] On Behalf Of Jonathan Haskins > > > Sent: Monday, September 27, 2004 9:18 PM > > > To: fle...@li... > > > Subject: Re: [FlexCP-devel] FlexCP + Web-CP integration > > > > > > The web://cp code base has problems though, we already discussed using > > > it for the base for flexcp and it was voted not to. So if we throw out > > > the flexcp code which is newer and better than the webcp code we would > > > actually be taking a step back. We would still have to rewrite the > > > portions dealing with multi-server, modules, and virtual users. > > > > > > Now admittedly webcp is further along than flexcp, but that is because > > > it is simpler in it's current stat. webcp cannot easily be taken any > > > further without almost a complete rewrite anyway. flexcp was started > > > from the beginning to be flexible, and as a result of that it is more > > > complicated to program it. > > > > > > What we really need is for someone to take the 20 hours or so that is > > > needed, and complete the work I started on the socket code between the > > > front end and backend. Make it rock solid so we can work on other > > things > > > which will share more common code with the webcp code base. Maybe I > > > might take another shot at it but I have to say I've already put lots > > of > > > time coding and trouble shooting into that section so I don't feel > > much > > > incentive at this point. > > > > > > On Mon, 2004-09-27 at 17:23 -0500, j@ckrabbit wrote: > > > > I wanted to throw an idea out there for integrating the Web-CP and > > > > FlexCP hosting control panel projects. It would go something like > > this: > > > > > > > > 1. Web-cp would be renamed to FlexCP. All development work for > > both > > > > projects would be done under the FlexCP banner. > > > > 2. FlexCP Version 1.0 would basically be just a final release of > > Web-CP > > > > (if it can ever get to that point). So beginning now the next > > release > > > > of web-cp would actually be FlexCP 0.5.4 then FlexCP 0.6.0 etc., > > etc. > > > > 3. Development work for FlexCP 2.0 would begin with the coding on > > > > FlexCP done to date and would continue to be worked on concurrently > > with > > > > FlexCP 0.x-1.0.x. It's first release could be something like 2.0.1. > > > > > > > > Basically this idea would be something akin to the direction that > > the > > > > Apache project has taken with its 1.x and 2.0.x projects. > > > > > > > > What do people think... Pros ??? Cons ??? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 > > > > Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement > > on > > > > who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. > > > > Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > flexcp-devel mailing list > > > > fle...@li... > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 > > > Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement > > on > > > who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. > > > Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php > > > _______________________________________________ > > > flexcp-devel mailing list > > > fle...@li... > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 > > Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on > > who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. > > Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php > > _______________________________________________ > > flexcp-devel mailing list > > fle...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 > Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on > who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. > Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php > _______________________________________________ > flexcp-devel mailing list > fle...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > ===== __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com |
|
From: Jason K. <jak...@mo...> - 2004-09-29 00:04:27
|
Ok, I'll get on the ball this week and install a new virtual server on my computer here for just FlexCP.. I'll be able to play with it a lot more. Anyone suggest a Linux distro we are focusing on? I personally use Slack. Thanks, Jay . > -----Original Message----- > From: fle...@li... [mailto:flexcp-devel- > ad...@li...] On Behalf Of Dennis Bollyn > Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2004 11:12 AM > To: fle...@li... > Subject: RE: [FlexCP-devel] FlexCP + Web-CP integration > > I'm willing to take a look at the code, but I have to re-install linux > first. The harddisk that > had linux on it crashed completely. After I get that going, I'm willing to > invest some time in > that. It seems that that's the main delay right now. If we get that sorted > out, adding additional > modules will be easier. > > A while back there was some discussion on ACL, how far is that? > > --- Jonathan Haskins <jha...@ki...> wrote: > > > The cvs semi works right now but it does not handle a > > disconnect/reconnect situation correctly right now. It's usable but > > after awhile it will time out (as it should) and when you reload for the > > first time it fails to recognize it's been disconnected and comes up > > with errors about not being able to talk to the server. > > > > On Mon, 2004-09-27 at 21:32 -0400, Jason Kendall wrote: > > > John, If you can get something started that semi works, I wouldn't > mind > > > working towards making it rock solid. Or at least a RFC that relates > to > > > that communication, and where you where heading with it so we can pull > > > it all together. > > > > > > . > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: fle...@li... [mailto:flexcp-devel- > > > > ad...@li...] On Behalf Of Jonathan Haskins > > > > Sent: Monday, September 27, 2004 9:18 PM > > > > To: fle...@li... > > > > Subject: Re: [FlexCP-devel] FlexCP + Web-CP integration > > > > > > > > The web://cp code base has problems though, we already discussed > using > > > > it for the base for flexcp and it was voted not to. So if we throw > out > > > > the flexcp code which is newer and better than the webcp code we > would > > > > actually be taking a step back. We would still have to rewrite the > > > > portions dealing with multi-server, modules, and virtual users. > > > > > > > > Now admittedly webcp is further along than flexcp, but that is > because > > > > it is simpler in it's current stat. webcp cannot easily be taken any > > > > further without almost a complete rewrite anyway. flexcp was started > > > > from the beginning to be flexible, and as a result of that it is > more > > > > complicated to program it. > > > > > > > > What we really need is for someone to take the 20 hours or so that > is > > > > needed, and complete the work I started on the socket code between > the > > > > front end and backend. Make it rock solid so we can work on other > > > things > > > > which will share more common code with the webcp code base. Maybe I > > > > might take another shot at it but I have to say I've already put > lots > > > of > > > > time coding and trouble shooting into that section so I don't feel > > > much > > > > incentive at this point. > > > > > > > > On Mon, 2004-09-27 at 17:23 -0500, j@ckrabbit wrote: > > > > > I wanted to throw an idea out there for integrating the Web-CP and > > > > > FlexCP hosting control panel projects. It would go something like > > > this: > > > > > > > > > > 1. Web-cp would be renamed to FlexCP. All development work for > > > both > > > > > projects would be done under the FlexCP banner. > > > > > 2. FlexCP Version 1.0 would basically be just a final release of > > > Web-CP > > > > > (if it can ever get to that point). So beginning now the next > > > release > > > > > of web-cp would actually be FlexCP 0.5.4 then FlexCP 0.6.0 etc., > > > etc. > > > > > 3. Development work for FlexCP 2.0 would begin with the coding on > > > > > FlexCP done to date and would continue to be worked on > concurrently > > > with > > > > > FlexCP 0.x-1.0.x. It's first release could be something like > 2.0.1. > > > > > > > > > > Basically this idea would be something akin to the direction that > > > the > > > > > Apache project has taken with its 1.x and 2.0.x projects. > > > > > > > > > > What do people think... Pros ??? Cons ??? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 > > > > > Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your > judgement > > > on > > > > > who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. > > > > > Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > flexcp-devel mailing list > > > > > fle...@li... > > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 > > > > Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement > > > on > > > > who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. > > > > Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > flexcp-devel mailing list > > > > fle...@li... > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 > > > Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement > on > > > who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. > > > Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php > > > _______________________________________________ > > > flexcp-devel mailing list > > > fle...@li... > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 > > Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on > > who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. > > Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php > > _______________________________________________ > > flexcp-devel mailing list > > fle...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > > > > > ===== > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 > Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on > who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. > Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php > _______________________________________________ > flexcp-devel mailing list > fle...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel |
|
From: <j...@ck...> - 2004-09-29 00:28:22
|
I could also make a server available via ssh for developers that don't have their own linux box. slack would be my preference. Jason Kendall wrote: > Ok, I'll get on the ball this week and install a new virtual server on > my computer here for just FlexCP.. I'll be able to play with it a lot > more. Anyone suggest a Linux distro we are focusing on? I personally use > Slack. > > Thanks, > Jay |
|
From: Dennis B. <gy...@ya...> - 2004-09-29 12:34:48
|
That might be a good idea. It would certainly help me out because installing linux with KDE and the lot isn't something you do in a couple of minutes (especially if you have a source-only distro). --- "j@ckrabbit" <jac...@ho...> wrote: > I could also make a server available via ssh for developers that don't > have their own linux box. slack would be my preference. > > Jason Kendall wrote: > > > Ok, I'll get on the ball this week and install a new virtual server on > > my computer here for just FlexCP.. I'll be able to play with it a lot > > more. Anyone suggest a Linux distro we are focusing on? I personally use > > Slack. > > > > Thanks, > > Jay > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal > Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us > Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl > _______________________________________________ > flexcp-devel mailing list > fle...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > ===== _______________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today! http://vote.yahoo.com |
|
From: Shimon <sh...@gm...> - 2004-09-29 01:40:39
|
debian it is the easy for server admins to use thanks to APT and the dpkg database not stuffing up comenly (like with rpm) and few people came into the irc channel and said if flexcp is going to be compatble with debian.... so go with debian and you can also set up slack, fedora,... to test if it works with those distros On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:27:27 -0500, j@ckrabbit <jac...@ho...> wrote: > I could also make a server available via ssh for developers that don't > have their own linux box. slack would be my preference. > > > > Jason Kendall wrote: > > > Ok, I'll get on the ball this week and install a new virtual server on > > my computer here for just FlexCP.. I'll be able to play with it a lot > > more. Anyone suggest a Linux distro we are focusing on? I personally use > > Slack. > > > > Thanks, > > Jay > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal > Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us > Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl > _______________________________________________ > flexcp-devel mailing list > fle...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > -- From the desk of shimon. |
|
From: Jason K. <jak...@mo...> - 2004-09-29 01:51:09
|
I'm sorry. I don't believe in pre-built packages, unless it's used for distro distribution only. Everything else should be compile able. Personally, I think it should be developed on slack, only because it's obscure enough that if we get it to run on that, then it should run on anything. It's all command line, no config files that automate, and simple. After that, it's just a matter of changing install instructions to define the other's config files. . > -----Original Message----- > From: fle...@li... [mailto:flexcp-devel- > ad...@li...] On Behalf Of Shimon > Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2004 9:41 PM > To: fle...@li... > Subject: Re: [FlexCP-devel] FlexCP + Web-CP integration > > debian it is the easy for server admins to use thanks to APT and the > dpkg database not stuffing up comenly (like with rpm) and few people > came into the irc channel and said if flexcp is going to be compatble > with debian.... so go with debian and you can also set up slack, > fedora,... to test if it works with those distros > > > On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:27:27 -0500, j@ckrabbit > <jac...@ho...> wrote: > > I could also make a server available via ssh for developers that don't > > have their own linux box. slack would be my preference. > > > > > > > > Jason Kendall wrote: > > > > > Ok, I'll get on the ball this week and install a new virtual server on > > > my computer here for just FlexCP.. I'll be able to play with it a lot > > > more. Anyone suggest a Linux distro we are focusing on? I personally > use > > > Slack. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Jay > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal > > Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give > us > > Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out > more > > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl > > _______________________________________________ > > flexcp-devel mailing list > > fle...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > > > > > > -- > >From the desk of shimon. > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal > Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us > Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out > more > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl > _______________________________________________ > flexcp-devel mailing list > fle...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel |
|
From: Jonathan H. <jha...@ki...> - 2004-09-29 01:55:09
|
Which distribution should not matter at this point in the development. Once we start working with packaging rpms and debs we'll worry about supporting specific dists. I do most of my developing on a fedora workstation. On Wed, 2004-09-29 at 11:40 +1000, Shimon wrote: > debian it is the easy for server admins to use thanks to APT and the > dpkg database not stuffing up comenly (like with rpm) and few people > came into the irc channel and said if flexcp is going to be compatble > with debian.... so go with debian and you can also set up slack, > fedora,... to test if it works with those distros > > > On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:27:27 -0500, j@ckrabbit > <jac...@ho...> wrote: > > I could also make a server available via ssh for developers that don't > > have their own linux box. slack would be my preference. > > > > > > > > Jason Kendall wrote: > > > > > Ok, I'll get on the ball this week and install a new virtual server on > > > my computer here for just FlexCP.. I'll be able to play with it a lot > > > more. Anyone suggest a Linux distro we are focusing on? I personally use > > > Slack. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Jay > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal > > Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us > > Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more > > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl > > _______________________________________________ > > flexcp-devel mailing list > > fle...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > > > > > |
|
From: Jason K. <jak...@mo...> - 2004-09-29 02:04:29
|
I'm just thinking that distros put applications in different spots. So each dev station will not fit with others. . > -----Original Message----- > From: fle...@li... [mailto:flexcp-devel- > ad...@li...] On Behalf Of Jonathan Haskins > Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2004 9:55 PM > To: fle...@li... > Subject: Re: [FlexCP-devel] FlexCP + Web-CP integration > > Which distribution should not matter at this point in the development. > Once we start working with packaging rpms and debs we'll worry about > supporting specific dists. I do most of my developing on a fedora > workstation. > > On Wed, 2004-09-29 at 11:40 +1000, Shimon wrote: > > debian it is the easy for server admins to use thanks to APT and the > > dpkg database not stuffing up comenly (like with rpm) and few people > > came into the irc channel and said if flexcp is going to be compatble > > with debian.... so go with debian and you can also set up slack, > > fedora,... to test if it works with those distros > > > > > > On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:27:27 -0500, j@ckrabbit > > <jac...@ho...> wrote: > > > I could also make a server available via ssh for developers that don't > > > have their own linux box. slack would be my preference. > > > > > > > > > > > > Jason Kendall wrote: > > > > > > > Ok, I'll get on the ball this week and install a new virtual server > on > > > > my computer here for just FlexCP.. I'll be able to play with it a > lot > > > > more. Anyone suggest a Linux distro we are focusing on? I personally > use > > > > Slack. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Jay > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on > ITManagersJournal > > > Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give > us > > > Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out > more > > > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl > > > _______________________________________________ > > > flexcp-devel mailing list > > > fle...@li... > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal > Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us > Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out > more > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl > _______________________________________________ > flexcp-devel mailing list > fle...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel |
|
From: Shimon <sh...@gm...> - 2004-09-29 02:05:54
|
what you should do is build whatever your product is with cross-architecture|cross-plaform in mind, and then provide packages native to each distribution. debian makes the latter half fairly easy and painless. But if your developers don't want to use Debian, that's their deal. well, as a development platform, installing the development environment and libraries you need is *really* easy on Debian. I don't know how easy on slack. that's the main thing I've got to say about it. from what a few people said on ##linux on freenode. GUYS can we come to the irc channel on freenode (#flexcp) On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 18:55:10 -0700, Jonathan Haskins <jha...@ki...> wrote: > Which distribution should not matter at this point in the development. > Once we start working with packaging rpms and debs we'll worry about > supporting specific dists. I do most of my developing on a fedora > workstation. > > > > On Wed, 2004-09-29 at 11:40 +1000, Shimon wrote: > > debian it is the easy for server admins to use thanks to APT and the > > dpkg database not stuffing up comenly (like with rpm) and few people > > came into the irc channel and said if flexcp is going to be compatble > > with debian.... so go with debian and you can also set up slack, > > fedora,... to test if it works with those distros > > > > > > On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:27:27 -0500, j@ckrabbit > > <jac...@ho...> wrote: > > > I could also make a server available via ssh for developers that don't > > > have their own linux box. slack would be my preference. > > > > > > > > > > > > Jason Kendall wrote: > > > > > > > Ok, I'll get on the ball this week and install a new virtual server on > > > > my computer here for just FlexCP.. I'll be able to play with it a lot > > > > more. Anyone suggest a Linux distro we are focusing on? I personally use > > > > Slack. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Jay > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal > > > Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us > > > Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more > > > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl > > > _______________________________________________ > > > flexcp-devel mailing list > > > fle...@li... > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal > Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us > Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl > _______________________________________________ > flexcp-devel mailing list > fle...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > -- From the desk of shimon. |
|
From: Shimon <sh...@gm...> - 2004-09-29 02:28:46
|
yea fedora (because they only go by LSB which doesnt cover everything) and suse have wirrod places for everything but debian goes by LSB and FHS On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 22:04:26 -0400, Jason Kendall <jak...@mo...> wrote: > I'm just thinking that distros put applications in different spots. So > each dev station will not fit with others. > > . > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: fle...@li... [mailto:flexcp-devel- > > ad...@li...] On Behalf Of Jonathan Haskins > > Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2004 9:55 PM > > To: fle...@li... > > Subject: Re: [FlexCP-devel] FlexCP + Web-CP integration > > > > Which distribution should not matter at this point in the development. > > Once we start working with packaging rpms and debs we'll worry about > > supporting specific dists. I do most of my developing on a fedora > > workstation. > > > > On Wed, 2004-09-29 at 11:40 +1000, Shimon wrote: > > > debian it is the easy for server admins to use thanks to APT and the > > > dpkg database not stuffing up comenly (like with rpm) and few people > > > came into the irc channel and said if flexcp is going to be > compatble > > > with debian.... so go with debian and you can also set up slack, > > > fedora,... to test if it works with those distros > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:27:27 -0500, j@ckrabbit > > > <jac...@ho...> wrote: > > > > I could also make a server available via ssh for developers that > don't > > > > have their own linux box. slack would be my preference. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jason Kendall wrote: > > > > > > > > > Ok, I'll get on the ball this week and install a new virtual > server > > on > > > > > my computer here for just FlexCP.. I'll be able to play with it > a > > lot > > > > > more. Anyone suggest a Linux distro we are focusing on? I > personally > > use > > > > > Slack. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > Jay > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on > > ITManagersJournal > > > > Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. > Give > > us > > > > Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find > out > > more > > > > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > flexcp-devel mailing list > > > > fle...@li... > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on > ITManagersJournal > > Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give > us > > Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out > > more > > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl > > _______________________________________________ > > flexcp-devel mailing list > > fle...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal > Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us > Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl > _______________________________________________ > flexcp-devel mailing list > fle...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > -- From the desk of shimon. |
|
From: Pablo C. <ge...@ci...> - 2004-09-30 16:53:37
|
BTW, My main development platform is a FreeBSD v4.10p2 box. :) Pablo. On 28 Sep 2004 at 20:28, Jonathan Haskins wrote: > FHS is part of, and included in, the LSB. Besides, paths should be > easy to change as long as we don't hardwire them. > > Right now flexcp will run on any fork()able OS that will compile PHP. > Basically this means any of the Unixes, so choose whatever devel box > you want. The more diverse our platforms are while developing it the > less we'll have to worry about porting later. > > On Wed, 2004-09-29 at 12:28 +1000, Shimon wrote: > > yea fedora (because they only go by LSB which doesnt cover > > everything) and suse have wirrod places for everything but debian > > goes by LSB and FHS > > > > > > On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 22:04:26 -0400, Jason Kendall > > <jak...@mo...> wrote: > > > I'm just thinking that distros put applications in different > > > spots. So each dev station will not fit with others. > > > > > > . > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: fle...@li... > > > > [mailto:flexcp-devel- ad...@li...] On Behalf Of > > > > Jonathan Haskins Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2004 9:55 PM To: > > > > fle...@li... Subject: Re: [FlexCP-devel] > > > > FlexCP + Web-CP integration > > > > > > > > Which distribution should not matter at this point in the > > > > development. Once we start working with packaging rpms and debs > > > > we'll worry about supporting specific dists. I do most of my > > > > developing on a fedora workstation. > > > > > > > > On Wed, 2004-09-29 at 11:40 +1000, Shimon wrote: > > > > > debian it is the easy for server admins to use thanks to APT > > > > > and the dpkg database not stuffing up comenly (like with rpm) > > > > > and few people came into the irc channel and said if flexcp is > > > > > going to be > > > compatble > > > > > with debian.... so go with debian and you can also set up > > > > > slack, fedora,... to test if it works with those distros > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:27:27 -0500, j@ckrabbit > > > > > <jac...@ho...> wrote: > > > > > > I could also make a server available via ssh for developers > > > > > > that > > > don't > > > > > > have their own linux box. slack would be my preference. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jason Kendall wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ok, I'll get on the ball this week and install a new > > > > > > > virtual > > > server > > > > on > > > > > > > my computer here for just FlexCP.. I'll be able to play > > > > > > > with it > > > a > > > > lot > > > > > > > more. Anyone suggest a Linux distro we are focusing on? I > > > personally > > > > use > > > > > > > Slack. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > Jay > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- This > > > > > > SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on > > > > ITManagersJournal > > > > > > Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of > > > > > > them. > > > Give > > > > us > > > > > > Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click > > > > > > to find > > > out > > > > more > > > > > > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl > > > > > > _______________________________________________ flexcp-devel > > > > > > mailing list fle...@li... > > > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on > > > ITManagersJournal > > > > Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of > > > > them. Give > > > us > > > > Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to > > > > find out more > > > > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl > > > > _______________________________________________ flexcp-devel > > > > mailing list fle...@li... > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on > > > ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what > > > you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift > > > Certificates! Click to find out more > > > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl > > > _______________________________________________ flexcp-devel > > > mailing list fle...@li... > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > >From the desk of shimon. > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on > > ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you > > think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift > > Certificates! Click to find out more > > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl > > _______________________________________________ flexcp-devel mailing > > list fle...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on > ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you > think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift > Certificates! Click to find out more > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl > _______________________________________________ flexcp-devel mailing > list fle...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > |
|
From: Jonathan H. <jon...@ki...> - 2004-09-30 16:58:08
|
Here's an interesting question. Has anyone tried running FlexCP with postgre instead of mysql? On Thu, 2004-09-30 at 13:53 -0300, Pablo Carboni wrote: > BTW, > > My main development platform is a FreeBSD v4.10p2 box. :) > > Pablo. > > On 28 Sep 2004 at 20:28, Jonathan Haskins wrote: > > > FHS is part of, and included in, the LSB. Besides, paths should be > > easy to change as long as we don't hardwire them. > > > > Right now flexcp will run on any fork()able OS that will compile PHP. > > Basically this means any of the Unixes, so choose whatever devel box > > you want. The more diverse our platforms are while developing it the > > less we'll have to worry about porting later. > > > > On Wed, 2004-09-29 at 12:28 +1000, Shimon wrote: > > > yea fedora (because they only go by LSB which doesnt cover > > > everything) and suse have wirrod places for everything but debian > > > goes by LSB and FHS > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 22:04:26 -0400, Jason Kendall > > > <jak...@mo...> wrote: > > > > I'm just thinking that distros put applications in different > > > > spots. So each dev station will not fit with others. > > > > > > > > . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: fle...@li... > > > > > [mailto:flexcp-devel- ad...@li...] On Behalf Of > > > > > Jonathan Haskins Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2004 9:55 PM To: > > > > > fle...@li... Subject: Re: [FlexCP-devel] > > > > > FlexCP + Web-CP integration > > > > > > > > > > Which distribution should not matter at this point in the > > > > > development. Once we start working with packaging rpms and debs > > > > > we'll worry about supporting specific dists. I do most of my > > > > > developing on a fedora workstation. > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 2004-09-29 at 11:40 +1000, Shimon wrote: > > > > > > debian it is the easy for server admins to use thanks to APT > > > > > > and the dpkg database not stuffing up comenly (like with rpm) > > > > > > and few people came into the irc channel and said if flexcp is > > > > > > going to be > > > > compatble > > > > > > with debian.... so go with debian and you can also set up > > > > > > slack, fedora,... to test if it works with those distros > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:27:27 -0500, j@ckrabbit > > > > > > <jac...@ho...> wrote: > > > > > > > I could also make a server available via ssh for developers > > > > > > > that > > > > don't > > > > > > > have their own linux box. slack would be my preference. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jason Kendall wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ok, I'll get on the ball this week and install a new > > > > > > > > virtual > > > > server > > > > > on > > > > > > > > my computer here for just FlexCP.. I'll be able to play > > > > > > > > with it > > > > a > > > > > lot > > > > > > > > more. Anyone suggest a Linux distro we are focusing on? I > > > > personally > > > > > use > > > > > > > > Slack. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > Jay > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- This > > > > > > > SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on > > > > > ITManagersJournal > > > > > > > Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of > > > > > > > them. > > > > Give > > > > > us > > > > > > > Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click > > > > > > > to find > > > > out > > > > > more > > > > > > > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ flexcp-devel > > > > > > > mailing list fle...@li... > > > > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on > > > > ITManagersJournal > > > > > Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of > > > > > them. Give > > > > us > > > > > Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to > > > > > find out more > > > > > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl > > > > > _______________________________________________ flexcp-devel > > > > > mailing list fle...@li... > > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on > > > > ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what > > > > you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift > > > > Certificates! Click to find out more > > > > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl > > > > _______________________________________________ flexcp-devel > > > > mailing list fle...@li... > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > >From the desk of shimon. > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on > > > ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you > > > think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift > > > Certificates! Click to find out more > > > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl > > > _______________________________________________ flexcp-devel mailing > > > list fle...@li... > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on > > ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you > > think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift > > Certificates! Click to find out more > > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl > > _______________________________________________ flexcp-devel mailing > > list fle...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal > Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us > Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl > _______________________________________________ > flexcp-devel mailing list > fle...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > > |
|
From: Wouter de V. <wo...@af...> - 2004-09-30 17:05:35
|
Jonathan Haskins wrote: > Here's an interesting question. Has anyone tried running FlexCP with > postgre instead of mysql? Nope. Kind regards, Wouter de Vries |
|
From: Dennis B. <gy...@ya...> - 2004-09-30 17:53:20
|
In theory, it should work. I've wriite some code myself that doesn't use the wrapper functions, though. A check for mysql_query should probably make it compatible. --- Jonathan Haskins <jon...@ki...> wrote: > Here's an interesting question. Has anyone tried running FlexCP with > postgre instead of mysql? > > On Thu, 2004-09-30 at 13:53 -0300, Pablo Carboni wrote: > > BTW, > > > > My main development platform is a FreeBSD v4.10p2 box. :) > > > > Pablo. > > > > On 28 Sep 2004 at 20:28, Jonathan Haskins wrote: > > > > > FHS is part of, and included in, the LSB. Besides, paths should be > > > easy to change as long as we don't hardwire them. > > > > > > Right now flexcp will run on any fork()able OS that will compile PHP. > > > Basically this means any of the Unixes, so choose whatever devel box > > > you want. The more diverse our platforms are while developing it the > > > less we'll have to worry about porting later. > > > > > > On Wed, 2004-09-29 at 12:28 +1000, Shimon wrote: > > > > yea fedora (because they only go by LSB which doesnt cover > > > > everything) and suse have wirrod places for everything but debian > > > > goes by LSB and FHS > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 22:04:26 -0400, Jason Kendall > > > > <jak...@mo...> wrote: > > > > > I'm just thinking that distros put applications in different > > > > > spots. So each dev station will not fit with others. > > > > > > > > > > . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > From: fle...@li... > > > > > > [mailto:flexcp-devel- ad...@li...] On Behalf Of > > > > > > Jonathan Haskins Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2004 9:55 PM To: > > > > > > fle...@li... Subject: Re: [FlexCP-devel] > > > > > > FlexCP + Web-CP integration > > > > > > > > > > > > Which distribution should not matter at this point in the > > > > > > development. Once we start working with packaging rpms and debs > > > > > > we'll worry about supporting specific dists. I do most of my > > > > > > developing on a fedora workstation. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 2004-09-29 at 11:40 +1000, Shimon wrote: > > > > > > > debian it is the easy for server admins to use thanks to APT > > > > > > > and the dpkg database not stuffing up comenly (like with rpm) > > > > > > > and few people came into the irc channel and said if flexcp is > > > > > > > going to be > > > > > compatble > > > > > > > with debian.... so go with debian and you can also set up > > > > > > > slack, fedora,... to test if it works with those distros > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:27:27 -0500, j@ckrabbit > > > > > > > <jac...@ho...> wrote: > > > > > > > > I could also make a server available via ssh for developers > > > > > > > > that > > > > > don't > > > > > > > > have their own linux box. slack would be my preference. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jason Kendall wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ok, I'll get on the ball this week and install a new > > > > > > > > > virtual > > > > > server > > > > > > on > > > > > > > > > my computer here for just FlexCP.. I'll be able to play > > > > > > > > > with it > > > > > a > > > > > > lot > > > > > > > > > more. Anyone suggest a Linux distro we are focusing on? I > > > > > personally > > > > > > use > > > > > > > > > Slack. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > Jay > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- This > > > > > > > > SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on > > > > > > ITManagersJournal > > > > > > > > Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of > > > > > > > > them. > > > > > Give > > > > > > us > > > > > > > > Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click > > > > > > > > to find > > > > > out > > > > > > more > > > > > > > > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ flexcp-devel > > > > > > > > mailing list fle...@li... > > > > > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on > > > > > ITManagersJournal > > > > > > Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of > > > > > > them. Give > > > > > us > > > > > > Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to > > > > > > find out more > > > > > > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl > > > > > > _______________________________________________ flexcp-devel > > > > > > mailing list fle...@li... > > > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on > > > > > ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what > > > > > you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift > > > > > Certificates! Click to find out more > > > > > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl > > > > > _______________________________________________ flexcp-devel > > > > > mailing list fle...@li... > > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > >From the desk of shimon. > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on > > > > ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you > > > > think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift > > > > Certificates! Click to find out more > > > > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl > > > > _______________________________________________ flexcp-devel mailing > > > > list fle...@li... > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on > > > ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you > > > think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift > > > Certificates! Click to find out more > > > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl > > > _______________________________________________ flexcp-devel mailing > > > list fle...@li... > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal > > Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us > > Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more > > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl > > _______________________________________________ > > flexcp-devel mailing list > > fle...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal > Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us > Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl > _______________________________________________ > flexcp-devel mailing list > fle...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > ===== __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com |
|
From: Jonathan H. <jon...@ki...> - 2004-09-29 03:28:06
|
FHS is part of, and included in, the LSB. Besides, paths should be easy to change as long as we don't hardwire them. Right now flexcp will run on any fork()able OS that will compile PHP. Basically this means any of the Unixes, so choose whatever devel box you want. The more diverse our platforms are while developing it the less we'll have to worry about porting later. On Wed, 2004-09-29 at 12:28 +1000, Shimon wrote: > yea fedora (because they only go by LSB which doesnt cover everything) > and suse have wirrod places for everything but debian goes by LSB and > FHS > > > On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 22:04:26 -0400, Jason Kendall > <jak...@mo...> wrote: > > I'm just thinking that distros put applications in different spots. So > > each dev station will not fit with others. > > > > . > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: fle...@li... [mailto:flexcp-devel- > > > ad...@li...] On Behalf Of Jonathan Haskins > > > Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2004 9:55 PM > > > To: fle...@li... > > > Subject: Re: [FlexCP-devel] FlexCP + Web-CP integration > > > > > > Which distribution should not matter at this point in the development. > > > Once we start working with packaging rpms and debs we'll worry about > > > supporting specific dists. I do most of my developing on a fedora > > > workstation. > > > > > > On Wed, 2004-09-29 at 11:40 +1000, Shimon wrote: > > > > debian it is the easy for server admins to use thanks to APT and the > > > > dpkg database not stuffing up comenly (like with rpm) and few people > > > > came into the irc channel and said if flexcp is going to be > > compatble > > > > with debian.... so go with debian and you can also set up slack, > > > > fedora,... to test if it works with those distros > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:27:27 -0500, j@ckrabbit > > > > <jac...@ho...> wrote: > > > > > I could also make a server available via ssh for developers that > > don't > > > > > have their own linux box. slack would be my preference. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jason Kendall wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Ok, I'll get on the ball this week and install a new virtual > > server > > > on > > > > > > my computer here for just FlexCP.. I'll be able to play with it > > a > > > lot > > > > > > more. Anyone suggest a Linux distro we are focusing on? I > > personally > > > use > > > > > > Slack. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Jay > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on > > > ITManagersJournal > > > > > Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. > > Give > > > us > > > > > Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find > > out > > > more > > > > > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > flexcp-devel mailing list > > > > > fle...@li... > > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on > > ITManagersJournal > > > Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give > > us > > > Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out > > > more > > > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl > > > _______________________________________________ > > > flexcp-devel mailing list > > > fle...@li... > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal > > Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us > > Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more > > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl > > _______________________________________________ > > flexcp-devel mailing list > > fle...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > > > > > > -- > >From the desk of shimon. > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal > Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us > Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl > _______________________________________________ > flexcp-devel mailing list > fle...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > > |
|
From: Shimon <sh...@gm...> - 2004-09-29 03:39:50
|
i can get a debian box up for testing if you want On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 20:28:05 -0700, Jonathan Haskins <jon...@ki...> wrote: > FHS is part of, and included in, the LSB. Besides, paths should be easy > to change as long as we don't hardwire them. > > Right now flexcp will run on any fork()able OS that will compile PHP. > Basically this means any of the Unixes, so choose whatever devel box you > want. The more diverse our platforms are while developing it the less > we'll have to worry about porting later. > > > > On Wed, 2004-09-29 at 12:28 +1000, Shimon wrote: > > yea fedora (because they only go by LSB which doesnt cover everything) > > and suse have wirrod places for everything but debian goes by LSB and > > FHS > > > > > > On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 22:04:26 -0400, Jason Kendall > > <jak...@mo...> wrote: > > > I'm just thinking that distros put applications in different spots. So > > > each dev station will not fit with others. > > > > > > . > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: fle...@li... [mailto:flexcp-devel- > > > > ad...@li...] On Behalf Of Jonathan Haskins > > > > Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2004 9:55 PM > > > > To: fle...@li... > > > > Subject: Re: [FlexCP-devel] FlexCP + Web-CP integration > > > > > > > > Which distribution should not matter at this point in the development. > > > > Once we start working with packaging rpms and debs we'll worry about > > > > supporting specific dists. I do most of my developing on a fedora > > > > workstation. > > > > > > > > On Wed, 2004-09-29 at 11:40 +1000, Shimon wrote: > > > > > debian it is the easy for server admins to use thanks to APT and the > > > > > dpkg database not stuffing up comenly (like with rpm) and few people > > > > > came into the irc channel and said if flexcp is going to be > > > compatble > > > > > with debian.... so go with debian and you can also set up slack, > > > > > fedora,... to test if it works with those distros > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:27:27 -0500, j@ckrabbit > > > > > <jac...@ho...> wrote: > > > > > > I could also make a server available via ssh for developers that > > > don't > > > > > > have their own linux box. slack would be my preference. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jason Kendall wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ok, I'll get on the ball this week and install a new virtual > > > server > > > > on > > > > > > > my computer here for just FlexCP.. I'll be able to play with it > > > a > > > > lot > > > > > > > more. Anyone suggest a Linux distro we are focusing on? I > > > personally > > > > use > > > > > > > Slack. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > Jay > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on > > > > ITManagersJournal > > > > > > Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. > > > Give > > > > us > > > > > > Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find > > > out > > > > more > > > > > > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > flexcp-devel mailing list > > > > > > fle...@li... > > > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on > > > ITManagersJournal > > > > Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give > > > us > > > > Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out > > > > more > > > > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > flexcp-devel mailing list > > > > fle...@li... > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal > > > Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us > > > Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more > > > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl > > > _______________________________________________ > > > flexcp-devel mailing list > > > fle...@li... > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > >From the desk of shimon. > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal > > Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us > > Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more > > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl > > _______________________________________________ > > flexcp-devel mailing list > > fle...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal > Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us > Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl > _______________________________________________ > flexcp-devel mailing list > fle...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > -- From the desk of shimon. |
|
From: Dennis B. <gy...@ya...> - 2004-09-29 12:40:09
|
If I get my box back up, it'll probably be some obscure distro (I was using CRUX before. Simply because I like doing this nobody else does :D. How about we make it run on a PS2? Hell, there are even more obscure things you can run linux on (Can the iPod linux fork()?) --- Jonathan Haskins <jon...@ki...> wrote: > FHS is part of, and included in, the LSB. Besides, paths should be easy > to change as long as we don't hardwire them. > > Right now flexcp will run on any fork()able OS that will compile PHP. > Basically this means any of the Unixes, so choose whatever devel box you > want. The more diverse our platforms are while developing it the less > we'll have to worry about porting later. > > On Wed, 2004-09-29 at 12:28 +1000, Shimon wrote: > > yea fedora (because they only go by LSB which doesnt cover everything) > > and suse have wirrod places for everything but debian goes by LSB and > > FHS > > > > > > On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 22:04:26 -0400, Jason Kendall > > <jak...@mo...> wrote: > > > I'm just thinking that distros put applications in different spots. So > > > each dev station will not fit with others. > > > > > > . > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: fle...@li... [mailto:flexcp-devel- > > > > ad...@li...] On Behalf Of Jonathan Haskins > > > > Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2004 9:55 PM > > > > To: fle...@li... > > > > Subject: Re: [FlexCP-devel] FlexCP + Web-CP integration > > > > > > > > Which distribution should not matter at this point in the development. > > > > Once we start working with packaging rpms and debs we'll worry about > > > > supporting specific dists. I do most of my developing on a fedora > > > > workstation. > > > > > > > > On Wed, 2004-09-29 at 11:40 +1000, Shimon wrote: > > > > > debian it is the easy for server admins to use thanks to APT and the > > > > > dpkg database not stuffing up comenly (like with rpm) and few people > > > > > came into the irc channel and said if flexcp is going to be > > > compatble > > > > > with debian.... so go with debian and you can also set up slack, > > > > > fedora,... to test if it works with those distros > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:27:27 -0500, j@ckrabbit > > > > > <jac...@ho...> wrote: > > > > > > I could also make a server available via ssh for developers that > > > don't > > > > > > have their own linux box. slack would be my preference. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jason Kendall wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ok, I'll get on the ball this week and install a new virtual > > > server > > > > on > > > > > > > my computer here for just FlexCP.. I'll be able to play with it > > > a > > > > lot > > > > > > > more. Anyone suggest a Linux distro we are focusing on? I > > > personally > > > > use > > > > > > > Slack. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > Jay > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on > > > > ITManagersJournal > > > > > > Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. > > > Give > > > > us > > > > > > Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find > > > out > > > > more > > > > > > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > flexcp-devel mailing list > > > > > > fle...@li... > > > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on > > > ITManagersJournal > > > > Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give > > > us > > > > Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out > > > > more > > > > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > flexcp-devel mailing list > > > > fle...@li... > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal > > > Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us > > > Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more > > > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl > > > _______________________________________________ > > > flexcp-devel mailing list > > > fle...@li... > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > >From the desk of shimon. > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal > > Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us > > Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more > > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl > > _______________________________________________ > > flexcp-devel mailing list > > fle...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal > Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us > Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl > _______________________________________________ > flexcp-devel mailing list > fle...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > ===== __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail |
|
From: Jonathan H. <jha...@ki...> - 2004-09-28 01:22:46
|
The web://cp code base has problems though, we already discussed using it for the base for flexcp and it was voted not to. So if we throw out the flexcp code which is newer and better than the webcp code we would actually be taking a step back. We would still have to rewrite the portions dealing with multi-server, modules, and virtual users. Now admittedly webcp is further along than flexcp, but that is because it is simpler in it's current stat. webcp cannot easily be taken any further without almost a complete rewrite anyway. flexcp was started from the beginning to be flexible, and as a result of that it is more complicated to program it. What we really need is for someone to take the 20 hours or so that is needed, and complete the work I started on the socket code between the front end and backend. Make it rock solid so we can work on other things which will share more common code with the webcp code base. Maybe I might take another shot at it but I have to say I've already put lots of time coding and trouble shooting into that section so I don't feel much incentive at this point. On Mon, 2004-09-27 at 17:23 -0500, j@ckrabbit wrote: > I wanted to throw an idea out there for integrating the Web-CP and > FlexCP hosting control panel projects. It would go something like this: > > 1. Web-cp would be renamed to FlexCP. All development work for both > projects would be done under the FlexCP banner. > 2. FlexCP Version 1.0 would basically be just a final release of Web-CP > (if it can ever get to that point). So beginning now the next release > of web-cp would actually be FlexCP 0.5.4 then FlexCP 0.6.0 etc., etc. > 3. Development work for FlexCP 2.0 would begin with the coding on > FlexCP done to date and would continue to be worked on concurrently with > FlexCP 0.x-1.0.x. It's first release could be something like 2.0.1. > > Basically this idea would be something akin to the direction that the > Apache project has taken with its 1.x and 2.0.x projects. > > What do people think... Pros ??? Cons ??? > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 > Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on > who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. > Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php > _______________________________________________ > flexcp-devel mailing list > fle...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > > |
|
From: Jonathan H. <jha...@ki...> - 2004-09-28 02:20:08
|
I kinda read that wrong, I see now that j@ckrabbit meant flexcp 2.0 would be based on the current flexcp codebase. I have no problem with that but I kinda think our time would be better spent working on flexcp rather than maintaining a webcp/flexcp .5/1.0. Anyway, disregard my last message, I personally have no preference as far as this is concerned. On Mon, 2004-09-27 at 18:22 -0700, Jonathan Haskins wrote: > The web://cp code base has problems though, we already discussed using > it for the base for flexcp and it was voted not to. So if we throw out > the flexcp code which is newer and better than the webcp code we would > actually be taking a step back. We would still have to rewrite the > portions dealing with multi-server, modules, and virtual users. > > Now admittedly webcp is further along than flexcp, but that is because > it is simpler in it's current stat. webcp cannot easily be taken any > further without almost a complete rewrite anyway. flexcp was started > from the beginning to be flexible, and as a result of that it is more > complicated to program it. > > What we really need is for someone to take the 20 hours or so that is > needed, and complete the work I started on the socket code between the > front end and backend. Make it rock solid so we can work on other things > which will share more common code with the webcp code base. Maybe I > might take another shot at it but I have to say I've already put lots of > time coding and trouble shooting into that section so I don't feel much > incentive at this point. > > On Mon, 2004-09-27 at 17:23 -0500, j@ckrabbit wrote: > > I wanted to throw an idea out there for integrating the Web-CP and > > FlexCP hosting control panel projects. It would go something like this: > > > > 1. Web-cp would be renamed to FlexCP. All development work for both > > projects would be done under the FlexCP banner. > > 2. FlexCP Version 1.0 would basically be just a final release of Web-CP > > (if it can ever get to that point). So beginning now the next release > > of web-cp would actually be FlexCP 0.5.4 then FlexCP 0.6.0 etc., etc. > > 3. Development work for FlexCP 2.0 would begin with the coding on > > FlexCP done to date and would continue to be worked on concurrently with > > FlexCP 0.x-1.0.x. It's first release could be something like 2.0.1. > > > > Basically this idea would be something akin to the direction that the > > Apache project has taken with its 1.x and 2.0.x projects. > > > > What do people think... Pros ??? Cons ??? > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 > > Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on > > who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. > > Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php > > _______________________________________________ > > flexcp-devel mailing list > > fle...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 > Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on > who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. > Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php > _______________________________________________ > flexcp-devel mailing list > fle...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > > |
|
From: Shimon <sh...@gm...> - 2004-09-28 02:58:08
|
i was going to start a new project called fpanel as you guys looked DEAD. i fund a few spondors and devs can you make a new section in you forus for people who want to aply to be devs? and i'll send the sponsores your way and i'll change fpanel to an add-on to flexcp which will basicly be a script installer On Mon, 27 Sep 2004 19:19:49 -0700, Jonathan Haskins <jha...@ki...> wrote: > I kinda read that wrong, I see now that j@ckrabbit meant flexcp 2.0 > would be based on the current flexcp codebase. I have no problem with > that but I kinda think our time would be better spent working on flexcp > rather than maintaining a webcp/flexcp .5/1.0. Anyway, disregard my last > message, I personally have no preference as far as this is concerned. > > > > On Mon, 2004-09-27 at 18:22 -0700, Jonathan Haskins wrote: > > The web://cp code base has problems though, we already discussed using > > it for the base for flexcp and it was voted not to. So if we throw out > > the flexcp code which is newer and better than the webcp code we would > > actually be taking a step back. We would still have to rewrite the > > portions dealing with multi-server, modules, and virtual users. > > > > Now admittedly webcp is further along than flexcp, but that is because > > it is simpler in it's current stat. webcp cannot easily be taken any > > further without almost a complete rewrite anyway. flexcp was started > > from the beginning to be flexible, and as a result of that it is more > > complicated to program it. > > > > What we really need is for someone to take the 20 hours or so that is > > needed, and complete the work I started on the socket code between the > > front end and backend. Make it rock solid so we can work on other things > > which will share more common code with the webcp code base. Maybe I > > might take another shot at it but I have to say I've already put lots of > > time coding and trouble shooting into that section so I don't feel much > > incentive at this point. > > > > On Mon, 2004-09-27 at 17:23 -0500, j@ckrabbit wrote: > > > I wanted to throw an idea out there for integrating the Web-CP and > > > FlexCP hosting control panel projects. It would go something like this: > > > > > > 1. Web-cp would be renamed to FlexCP. All development work for both > > > projects would be done under the FlexCP banner. > > > 2. FlexCP Version 1.0 would basically be just a final release of Web-CP > > > (if it can ever get to that point). So beginning now the next release > > > of web-cp would actually be FlexCP 0.5.4 then FlexCP 0.6.0 etc., etc. > > > 3. Development work for FlexCP 2.0 would begin with the coding on > > > FlexCP done to date and would continue to be worked on concurrently with > > > FlexCP 0.x-1.0.x. It's first release could be something like 2.0.1. > > > > > > Basically this idea would be something akin to the direction that the > > > Apache project has taken with its 1.x and 2.0.x projects. > > > > > > What do people think... Pros ??? Cons ??? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 > > > Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on > > > who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. > > > Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php > > > _______________________________________________ > > > flexcp-devel mailing list > > > fle...@li... > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 > > Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on > > who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. > > Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php > > _______________________________________________ > > flexcp-devel mailing list > > fle...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 > Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on > who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. > Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php > _______________________________________________ > flexcp-devel mailing list > fle...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > -- From the desk of shimon. |
Thanks for helping keep SourceForge clean.
X