From: <swp...@sn...> - 2006-08-05 12:21:29
|
Charlie Brady charlieb-flexbackup-at-e-smith.com |Lists| wrote: > I don't know. Is that question relevant to this list? Are you offering = to=20 > sponsor the development of the features you find missing? No, in fact, I'm strongly considering implementing them directly myself! = :D As I wrote in my original post: > I'm tempted to take a stab at adding the meta data to the created and=20 > backuped data and implementing -restore and -search. I've just never=20 > used a tape backup system, only to-disk. Would anybody we willing to=20 > test any such enhancements on a tape-drive? To business: Charlie Brady charlieb-flexbackup-at-e-smith.com |Lists| wrote: > to create such a thing, you need a considerably more=20 > sophisticated process for creating incremental backups. I'm thinking that when creating a backup, incremental, differential or=20 otherwise, all that needs to get stored is the full current "list of=20 files" that currently exist on the disk within the backup set's directori= es. From that, after restoring either a full backup set a=20 full+incremental+incremental or whatever, then the "list of files" from=20 the last restored set (incremental or full) will contain exactly which=20 files should be present. Then one can (offer to) remove the files that=20 are not in the "list of files" or just present a list of files suggested=20 for deletion. It should be really easy! (Well, we'll see... :D) From the posts in this thread I'm aware that this new functionality=20 maybe shouldn't be the default. But I need it so I think I'll introduce=20 it as optional behavior. Peter --=20 Peter Valdemar M=F8rch http://www.morch.com |