From: Gaute L. <ga...@id...> - 2004-01-26 01:08:24
|
I find the -compare feature difficult to use. One must refer to a backup set with -num or 'mt fsf', while the "target" directory is the current. This is cumbersome. When running unattended backups, it is all but impossible to use -compare. As far as I can see, one would have to parse the log file to find the file number on tape. Why can't there be an option -verify, which automatically runs compare for each set? And, is it possible to have the -compare/-verify ignore files which are changed since the backup run, and not generate errors over such files? And for straight -compares, why can't flexbackup "find" the correct directory and file number automatically? If I issue 'flexbackup -compare -set bob', couldn't flexbackup just find the latest version of the set bob on tape, and compare it to the data on disk? If I have missed something, please excuse me, and point me in the right direction. For all my bitching: I really like flexbackup, it's features, it's use of standard tools, and the way it balances strength and features vs. simplicity. Good work! Med vennleg helsing / Best regards Gaute Lund IT consultant (GL184P-NORID, GL597-RIPE) iDrift AS Phone: (+47) 53 47 02 90 Direct: (+47) 53 47 02 93 Fax: (+47) 53 47 02 91 Mobile: (+47) 97 00 82 00 |