Re: [Flex-devel] Skeleton question

[Will E. <wes...@gm...>]

I think I prefer that we do things in C where we can.

On Friday,  4 December 2015,  9:26 pm -0500, Mighty Jo <mig...@gm...> wrote:

> Good evening folks,
> 
> I've been working on overhauling the scanner generation code to move all of
> the target language emissions into the skeleton.  I don't know yet whether
> the state tables can be generalized this way, but I've identified a few
> dozen sites where C code emissions can be converted to setting m4
> definitions and performing checks in the skeleton.
> 
> In the skeleton itself I've found similar checks coded two ways.  One is
> the collection of m4_check_something macros.  The other is the set of
> %check_something statements which are translated into m4 macro calls by
> skelout().
> 
> Which style do you prefer going forward?   I won't remove either of them in
> my work, but I have to augment at least one of them and I'd like to know
> the community's thoughts.
> 
> -Joe

> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Go from Idea to Many App Stores Faster with Intel(R) XDK
> Give your users amazing mobile app experiences with Intel(R) XDK.
> Use one codebase in this all-in-one HTML5 development environment.
> Design, debug & build mobile apps & 2D/3D high-impact games for multiple OSs.
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=254741911&iu=/4140

> _______________________________________________
> Flex-devel mailing list
> Fle...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flex-devel


-- 
Will Estes
Flex Project Maintainer
wes...@gm...
https://github.com/westes/flex