Re: [Flex-devel] My fork of flex, that supports Unicode
flex is a tool for generating scanners
Brought to you by:
wlestes
From: Will E. <wes...@gm...> - 2014-06-14 14:45:46
|
On Saturday, 14 June 2014, 11:39 am +0200, Mariusz Pluciński <plu...@gm...> wrote: > On 06/14/2014 02:38 AM, Will Estes wrote: > >So one of the things I'm doing is rewriting the test suite to use > >automake's parallel test suite support as it makes the test suite > >much easier to maintain, assuming I can get all the tests > >rewritten. I've got about 20 tests rewritten, with the caveat that > >I'm rewriting the easy tests first. > > Just for sake of experiment, I've ported flex build system from > autotools to CMake. As far as I checked, it works quite good- for > both building and testing. Do you think that such change would be > beneficial for mainline flex too? I don't think so at this point. > The parts of table that are not actively used by scanner programmer, > usually all contain the same value. This is especially true in long > not-yet-assigned Unicode planes. I suppose that even simple RLE may > give great difference here. I'd rather see a solution that works and is refineable than wait for something more perfect. > Don't worry, my code is currently on top of your master branch. > Okay, I'll then split my commits into smaller branches and start > with pull requests. Go for it! --Will |