Re: [Flex-devel] Own declaration of isatty() necessary?

[Will E. <wes...@gm...>]

Tim,

At this point, we also have autoconf magic to play with, so if we need
to do something, that's probably the right level to use rather than
doing it in the flex sources directly.

On Monday,  6 February 2012, 11:45 am +0000, Tim Landscheidt <ti...@ti...> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> AFAICS, Vern added the declaration of isatty() in
> http://flex.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/flex/flex/flex.skl?r1=2.72&r2=2.73.
> There are two bug reports concerning this where basically
> flex's declaration clashes with unistd.h's that adds a
> "__THROW" for C++.
> 
>   Is there any harm in replacing flex's declaration alto-
> gether by "#include <unistd.h>"?  I. e., are there used tar-
> get platforms that require flex itself to declare isatty?
> 
> Tim
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Try before you buy = See our experts in action!
> The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
> is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3,
> Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-dev2
> _______________________________________________
> Flex-devel mailing list
> Fle...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flex-devel