[Flex-devel] Own declaration of isatty() necessary?

[Tim L. <ti...@ti...>]

Hi,

AFAICS, Vern added the declaration of isatty() in
http://flex.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/flex/flex/flex.skl?r1=2.72&r2=2.73.
There are two bug reports concerning this where basically
flex's declaration clashes with unistd.h's that adds a
"__THROW" for C++.

  Is there any harm in replacing flex's declaration alto-
gether by "#include <unistd.h>"?  I. e., are there used tar-
get platforms that require flex itself to declare isatty?

Tim