Re: [Flex-devel] Issues with option processing

[Will E. <wl...@us...>]

On Thursday, 16 October 2008, 11:03 am -0400, Joe Krahn <kr...@ni...> wrote:

> Also, there are a few more functions that could be disabled by a 
> no<func_name> option. Instead making command-line options even more 
> numerous, maybe it would be a good idea to add a flag --options=LIST, 
> where LIST is a string containing options processed exactly as in the 
> %option directive.

Yes, that does make sense.