Re: [Flex-devel] Issues with option processing

[Aaron S. <aa...@se...>]

We'll have to see if any of those options are relied upon by  
Makefiles, but otherwise I like your idea. I don't recall if --nofoo  
is something that's part of lex-ancient or flex-2.5.4 or not.

Aaron


On Oct 16, 2008, at 8:03 AM, Joe Krahn wrote:

> I noticed that the option processor allows a 'no' prefix even where it
> doesn't make sense. In most cases, it probably is not that important,
> but someone may get confused if they try to use an option like
> "noextra-type".
>
> Also, there are a few more functions that could be disabled by a
> no<func_name> option. Instead making command-line options even more
> numerous, maybe it would be a good idea to add a flag --options=LIST,
> where LIST is a string containing options processed exactly as in the
> %option directive.
>
> Joe Krahn
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's  
> challenge
> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win  
> great prizes
> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in  
> the world
> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
> _______________________________________________
> Flex-devel mailing list
> Fle...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flex-devel