[Flex-devel] Issues with option processing

[Joe K. <kr...@ni...>]

I noticed that the option processor allows a 'no' prefix even where it 
doesn't make sense. In most cases, it probably is not that important, 
but someone may get confused if they try to use an option like 
"noextra-type".

Also, there are a few more functions that could be disabled by a 
no<func_name> option. Instead making command-line options even more 
numerous, maybe it would be a good idea to add a flag --options=LIST, 
where LIST is a string containing options processed exactly as in the 
%option directive.

Joe Krahn