Hello!
I don't know if it his has been touched on before but I was wondering if
it would make sense to make reentrant scanner generation default and
have a fallback-mode for traditional, old-style scanners?
-ayan
From: Aaron S. <aa...@se...> - 2008-08-23 16:16:18
Can't do it -- that would break nearly every existing scanner unless it
added some new option. There a lot of code out there that interacts with
a flex scanner and assumes that the globals will be available.
Aaron
On Sat, 2008-08-23 at 08:44 -0400, ruertar wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I don't know if it his has been touched on before but I was wondering if
> it would make sense to make reentrant scanner generation default and
> have a fallback-mode for traditional, old-style scanners?
>
> -ayan
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
> _______________________________________________
> Flex-devel mailing list
> Fle...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flex-devel
Aaron Stone wrote:
> Can't do it -- that would break nearly every existing scanner unless it
> added some new option.
Ya -- the idea would be to add an option to make a traditional,
non-reentrant scanner.
-ayan
From: Aaron S. <aa...@se...> - 2008-08-24 09:06:23
On Aug 23, 2008, at 12:14 PM, ruertar wrote:
> Aaron Stone wrote:
>> Can't do it -- that would break nearly every existing scanner
>> unless it
>> added some new option.
>
> Ya -- the idea would be to add an option to make a traditional,
> non-reentrant scanner.
Right, that's why it would break every single grammar in existence.
The default cannot be changed.
Aaron