Thread: [Firebug-cvs] firebug/doc/chassis chassis.tex,1.14,1.15
Brought to you by:
doolin
From: David M. D. <do...@us...> - 2005-12-16 06:18:06
|
Update of /cvsroot/firebug/firebug/doc/chassis In directory sc8-pr-cvs1.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv20370 Modified Files: chassis.tex Log Message: Added alex material. Index: chassis.tex =================================================================== RCS file: /cvsroot/firebug/firebug/doc/chassis/chassis.tex,v retrieving revision 1.14 retrieving revision 1.15 diff -C2 -d -r1.14 -r1.15 *** chassis.tex 17 Nov 2005 00:32:59 -0000 1.14 --- chassis.tex 16 Dec 2005 06:17:54 -0000 1.15 *************** *** 137,140 **** --- 137,310 ---- + + + + \section{Mica Mote Chassis} + + Early on we identified the following design objectives in a mounting chassis: + \begin{itemize} + \item Tool-less; requires only hands and possibly a coin to + open, disassemble, reassemble (rapid and simple) + \item Separation of modular components: sensing, power, mote, antennas + \begin{itemize} + \item Wiring harness to separate power connection + \item battery cage design to accommodate different battery candidates + \end{itemize} + \item Supports mounting by: screw, strap, zip-tie, velcro, magnet, hook, or similar + technology. + \item Injection moldable for low-cost high-volume production + \end{itemize} + + + \subsection{Design for Assembly} + + Since the Mica Mote Chassis were to + be assembled and disassembled in the field, the most prominent choices + for mounting and securing were snap-fit joints and thumbscrews. + Snap-fitting joints however require custom injection molding and are + difficult to prototype, so early on it was a preference to target the + design aound tool-less screw types. In addition, snap-fitting joints + would have only supported a fixed number of boards; one advantage of + the 51-pin edge connector employed by the Mica mote and sensor boards + is that many sensor boards are designed to be stackable such that the + pin-out leads can be passed through to additional boards. + + The Mica mote and sensor boards support screw or pin mounting with two + 0.120" (just smaller than 1/8") diameter holes located at opposite + (diagonal) corners. For such holes, it is advisable to use \#4 machine + screws. A requirement in securing the mote and sensor boards was that + the additional boards needed to be fixed in the z-axis (normal to the + board), otherwise they would either loosen from the edge connector or + strain the connector in a way to possibly cause failure. To provide a + 3/16" spacer between boards for support, threaded standoffs were used + so that they could fit between components in the screw assembly and + not become loose. In this manner, a mote and several boards can be + secured to a plastic chassis with two screws and a number of 3/16" + standoffs. + + To effectively use the screw holes on the mote, it was necessary to + remove the battery pack from the underside of the mote. The chassis + was designed so that the mote-and-sensor assembly would be a stack of + components sitting alongside a power source, connected to the mote by + wire harness or the original battery pack wiring. In this + configuration, the original battery pack could be peeled back from the + mote and secured to the chassis (still connected by wiring), or + another power source battery could be used. The battery pack was + secured to the mote by using self-tapping screws, fastening through + two holes already present in the battery pack. Battery clips or + sleeves, which could hold batteries of different form factors, could + then be screwed into that same mounting area. In one case, a set of + battery sleeves which held lithium-ion batteries was fabricated to + screw into the battery mounting holes. While the process of mounting + the battery clip or sleeve was not considered to be tool-less, it + could be done for a pre-configured chassis type before going to the + field. Following Boothroyd's guidelines of design for manual assembly + (Boothroyd, 1994), the screw-holes on the chassis were chamfered so + that alignment of the very small screws could be done by feel. + + One principal difficulty in using thumbscrews and standoffs in the + field is that they are very small, easy to lose, and difficult to + align. To solve this problem and simplify the assembly method, a + "pyramid assembly" concept outlined by Boothroyd (Boothroyd 1994) was + applied to the design. The primary concept of pyramid assembly is to + be able to stack multiple components onto a fixed guide axis. In this + case, the implementation involved "flipping the logic" of trying to + insert a loose screw from above into a set of components with holes, + to fixing the screw from below as part of the chassis and individually + stacking the components onto it from below. With this design, the + parts aligned themselves correctly to the component below them as they + were assembled. This not only aided with the edge connectors, but + specifically made application of the standoffs a much simpler task. + The screws themselves were affixed to the chassis by two small holes; + the screws were inserted from the bottom and secured at the top with a + 3/32" hex nut. While this process required the use of some tools, it + could be done before going into the field and once the screws were on + the chassis there was no reason to remove them. The 3/32" nut also + provided clearance from the underside of the mote, eliminating any + interference from components to the chassis plane. To finally secure + the components at the end of the screw, a 3/4" long threaded hexagonal + standoff was used. The standoff's six edges allowed for a good grip + between fingers and a thumb while maintaining a small horizontal + profile which would not interfere with circuit board components, + unlike larger wingnuts. + + Finally, for supporting chassis mounting to other surfaces, long slots + were designed which could support mounting by fabric strapping, + zip-ties, hard wires, or nails. Keyhole type mounts were incorporated + to support nails, screws, hooks, and push-pins. A magnet could also + be glued to the back of the chassis for mounting onto metal surfaces. + + \subsection{Design for Injection Molding} + + The first chassis designs were prototyped by machining 1/8" strips of + acrylic, shown in in Figure~\ref{fig:exploded_view_2}. To make the + design injection-moldable, it was first created as a solid model using + the SolidWorks CAD package. Three general design guidelines were + considered in adapting the prototype for moldability: + + \begin{itemize} + \item Maintain constant wall thickness for best dimensional accuracy + \item Avoid undercuts so that a "straight-pull" tool can be used + \item "Shell" the design to use a reasonable wall-thickness for moldability and cost + \end{itemize} + + The design was updated to use 0.08" wall thickness, reasonable for + polystyrene (PS), ABS, or polycarbonate (PC). The shelled design + allowed features on the underside, such as the heads of the mounting + screws or the bosses of the battery clip screws, to be neatly nested + beneath the part as it lay flat on a table. Structural stability with + a thinner design was aided by the perimeter wall but still a concern; + extending part wall around the slot features all the way to the bottom + effectively created a set of ribs which prevented extreme flexing. + Fig.~\ref{fig:cbim} shows early CAD renderings and early ABS + prototypes built from a fused deposition modeling (FDM) machine. + Later revisions of FDM prototypes durable enough for field testing. + Short-run injection molding through a service bureau such as Protomold + was determined to cost approximately \$2,500 for tooling and a fixed + lot of 25 parts, and between \$3 to \$10 per additional part (depending + on volume). + + + \begin{figure} + \begin{center} + \includegraphics[width=3in]{figs/exploded_view_2.eps} + \caption{An exploded view of the ``candy bar'' chassis + used for the controlled burn test at East Bay Regional + Parks Fire Department, Lake Chabot.} + \label{fig:exploded_view_2} + \end{center} + \end{figure} + + + + + + + \begin{figure} + \begin{center} + \subfigure[Front view.]{\label{subfig:candy_bar_injection_moldable_front}% + \includegraphics[width=2.5in]{figs/candy_bar_injection_moldable_front.eps}} + \subfigure[Back view.]{\label{subfig:candy_bar_injection_moldable_back}% + \includegraphics[width=2.5in]{figs/candy_bar_injection_moldable_back.eps}} + \subfigure[FDM front view.]{\label{subfig:fdm_front}% + \includegraphics[width=2.5in]{figs/fdm_front.eps}} + \subfigure[FDM back view.]{\label{subfig:fdm_back}% + \includegraphics[width=2.5in]{figs/fdm_back.eps}} + \caption{Injection mold design, and prototype using FDM technology.} + \label{fig:cbim} + \end{center} + \end{figure} + + + \begin{figure} + \begin{center} + \includegraphics[width=3in]{figs/fdm_assembled.eps} + \caption{Assembled mote using FDM prototype.} + \label{fig:fdm_assembled} + \end{center} + \end{figure} + + + \section{Mica Mote Chassis} |