From: Doug C. <dch...@ne...> - 2001-04-20 14:04:42
|
At 4/20/2001 09:53 AM (Friday), Leyne, Sean wrote: >I thought that it was agreed that the 0.9 release would reflect the >initial FB release based on the originally release IB source code, plus >the appropriate changes necessary to address the compile and operations >bugs which were embodied in that 'quality' release. > >Additionally, the v1.0 release was going to be the first release in >which we, as a group, would start 'spreading our wings' and adding new >functionality. I remember this also and agree with Sean's post. I also think there is too fine a point being put on the release numbering. I don't think we need a 0.9-5 with a beta suffix added. In my mind we should be able to assemble a 0.9 version rather quickly here and get it distributed. it should include the original open source with bug fixes. Perhaps the 0.94 which has been out already would be that. The next version I think should be 1.0, released in beta 1,2,3,4 versions as testing is done. |