From: <Sch...@t-...> - 2000-11-30 07:48:00
|
reed mideke schrieb: > FWIW, I consider a build broken if you have to re-start it. This can > hide real problems, because things get touched even if the build failed, > and although the build completes with a 'success' message the resulting > product may not be complete or correct. The builds pass the TCS and some real life tests despite of these errors. > I have not had to do this with > the traditional classic builds on linux, or the builds on NT. I had this errors from the first time I got a cvs version (beginning of september) and as I said, they occur also with kernel builds, so it's definitely not the fault of the IB source. > > I admit I haven't built on linux for a while. > I've been using egcs-2.91.66, as distributed with SuSE 6.1. > Machine has 48 MB of memory. I'm using a SuSE 6.3 system with 40MB. Maybe I should try this on a SuSE 7.0 with some more memory. Frank -- "Fascinating creatures, phoenixes. They can carry immensely heavy loads, their tears have healing powers and they make highly faithful pets." - J.K. Rowling http://firebird.sourceforge.net |