Re: [Firebird-website] OdbcJdbc v2-0-Beta Ver 02.00.00.0144 released

[Helen B. <he...@fi...>]

At 10:14 PM 22/10/2007, you wrote:
>Helen Borrie escribió:
>> At 12:35 AM 20/10/2007, Jorge Andrés Brugger wrote:
>>   
>
>> The discovery of a bug does not seem a good reason to hide a beta release, given the purpose of betas.  Marius and other ODBC users please comment.  I will proceed according to the general view.
>>   
>I agree, but right now stable release is more "beta" than actual beta, 
>so most stable and recommendable for production use is 2.0.142 beta :)

The problem is, you need to take this to the ODBC-devel list as here is the website list (which Vladimir does not read).

>I think a final version should be released, actual versioning schema is 
>confuse (for the reason given before, 2.0.142 is better for production 
>use than 1.2.0.69). http://www.ibphoenix.com/main.nfs?page=ibp_60_odbc 
>should have only two choices: a stable release (maybe 2.0.142?) and a 
>beta release (2.0.144).

Again, this is not a website issue.  You need to express your views in the right quarters. :-)

>> Helen
>>
>> p.s. (Off-topic, Jorge:  I understand that this looks like a regression but I wonder, did Access generate your strange WHERE clause?  Fb ignores extraneous brackets but I know of at least one API implementation that has parser difficulties when they are included.)
>>   
>Yes, queries and logs are generated by Access. But 142 build has no 
>problems at all with them ...

Still, you should consult Vladimir, as this might be deliberate...

Helen