From: Paul V. <pa...@vi...> - 2005-04-16 10:33:38
|
Hi all, Are we still supposed to commit webpage alterations to CVS? (Please say Yes.) I'm asking because when I wanted to update a page yesterday, I noticed that some pages had been altered and not committed. This is risky because not everybody will make the doublecheck of doing a CVS update *and* checking the versions on the SF shell server. If you don't do the latter and pages have changed, updating them will undo any uncommitted changes. If you don't do *either* it's even worse! :-) (This has happened already.) There were also a number of new pages that haven't been added to the CVS tree at all. If we don't use CVS anymore, how do we avoid undoing each other's work? Greetings, Paul Vinkenoog PS I've committed the three altered pages in htdocs/doc/ now. Didn't touch the other stuff. |