RE: [Firebird-website] (no subject)

[Kaputnik <de...@ka...>]

Hi,

a friend of mine is building very dynamic html-pages with mySQL and php4. It
is very easy to maintain, except for the lack of FK-constraints in mySQL
:-))
he has a nice framework, some HTML-Templates, and a database containing the
content.
If some article has to be put up, it is simply stored as row in the
DB-table.
the complete navigation is done with php, and all links are built
automatically...so, with a small db-tool in delphi (which I built for him)
every dummy could add a new article or complete new content including new
navigation-links (provided, he has db-access)-
I for myself would very much like to have the FB-website put up with either
php4 and FB as backend or even Delphi (isapi) and FB-DB as backend.
I know, that putting an FB-server up on the sourceforge-site would be
difficult, but I definitely can spare a dedicated FB-server here at my site
(connected via switch with 100MBit/s to the internet), on which the php4 on
sourceforge could have access to.
Putting up the php4-framework is only a matter of time and money (i have to
pay him, even if he is my firend, but would do it, if you like the idea).
This way, the FB-website would be the best marketing for FB itself, as the
site would have a small "Built with FireBird" tag :-))


P.S. I definitely hope, that the talk in this new list will be productive,
and everybody is friendly to the others ;-)
My 2 cents...

CU, Kaputnik
(Nick Josipovic)

ni...@ka... <mailto:ni...@ka...>
ka...@ka... <mailto:ka...@ka...>
--------------------------------------------------------------
superior Client/Server programming:
www.IBObjects.com <http://www.IBObjects.com>
a nice tool for Interbase:
www.InterbaseWorkbench.com <http://www.InterbaseWorkbench.com>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: fir...@li...
> [mailto:fir...@li...]On Behalf Of
> pc...@at...
> Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2001 5:58 PM
>
> Hi
>
> I agree in principle to all the ideas you proposed.
> I just feel that the site does have the potential
> to become very big. We should in my opinion right
> from the start use a tool to do management. I am
> not familiar realy with such tools so I dont
> know what is best. It is easier to start right
> and with a learning curve than to go over to a
> tool to manage the website once we realize we cant
> cope any longer. Such a tool would also enable us to,
> with more willingness consider new ideas that
> would entail extra work, because it would not envolve
> that much extra work. I have something in mind
> but I think we should first agree to use something
> like that or not.
>
> Groetnis
> Gerhardus
>