Re: [Firebird-net-provider] FbBatchExecution doesn't assign sqlTransaction to atomicCommand

[Abel E. P. <sa...@sa...>]

Greetings Mike,

Carlos has gently forwarded this message to me.
FbBatchExecution is not complete. I was expecting to have it finished last
week, but the time available made it impossible.
The problem you've experimented exists because the
FbBatchExecution.Execute() is not complete (I think it's the only method
remaining)...
I'll keep yor email and notify you soon as I finnish it. Anyway, I hope to
complete the Isql namespace by next friday to be ready for 1.6 Beta 1
release.

Best regards,

Abel Eduardo Pereira

"Mike Scott" <mik...@ex...> wrote in message
news:405...@ex......
> Hi Carlos
>
> Long time no speak! I've been working on a different project which
> didn't require Firebird, but now we're back looking at Firebird again so
> you'll probably see more messages from me in the future :-)
>
> I don't know if you remember, but I was interested in getting a better
> ISQL script parser. I now see that you've implemented a parser class and
> I've been playing with FbBatchExecution. However, I get exceptions which
> complain that the command has no transaction set. Having looked at the
> code, I can see that you don't assign the sqlTransaction to the
> atomicCommand in the loop in Execute(). So the commands don't have the
> transaction assigned.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Mike Scott.
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
> Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
> GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
> administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> Firebird-net-provider mailing list
> Fir...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-net-provider
>