From: Dmitry A. <fd...@do...> - 2004-03-12 10:20:36
|
"JS.staff" wrote: > That would be useful to me too - specially with the timestamp issue > potentially causing problems with the concurrency checking for a 'all > field' check. Yes, for this we can made third mode: what in where generate primary key and "TIMESTAMP" field for example... I'm need in this may be too... anyway I this wants the breach of the parallelism for governing checking! |