Re: [Firebird-net-provider] FbDbType.LongVarBinary removal question

[Da J. <da...@ho...>]

Dear Carlos,

My humble two cents: From point view of an ex-SQL Server programmer, I would
think FbDbType.LongVarBinary represents Firebird binary blobs better than
FbDbType.Binary. If they represents the same binary blobs, LongVarBinary
will tell people like me what it really is.
Thank you for bring us this wonderful product.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Carlos Guzmán Álvarez" <car...@te...>
To: "firebird-net-provider" <fir...@li...>
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 4:46 AM
Subject: [Firebird-net-provider] FbDbType.LongVarBinary removal question


> Hello:
>
> I'm thinking on remove FbDbType.LongVarBinary element in 1.6 sources, i
> think it's not really needed as we have already a FbDbType.Binary
> element that has the same meaning and i think that it's more correct for
> binary blobs.
>
> But i want to know first people opinions :)
>
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards
>
> Carlos Guzmán Álvarez
> Vigo-Spain
>
>
> P.S.: I have plans for release the 1.6 Alpha 1 this week after have
> finished some changes in the Array data type support.
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now.
> Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with
> a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now!
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> Firebird-net-provider mailing list
> Fir...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-net-provider
>