Re: [Firebird-net-provider] .NET provider Performance

[Da J. <da...@ho...>]

Thank you, Peter,

I am concerning the speed to access Firebird, I am working on the server =
side and not worrying UI performance. Are you saying C# net provider is =
faster than C++ API to run the same query against Firebird?

----- Original Message -----=20
  From: Peter Martens=20
  To: 'FB-NETProvider'=20
  Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2004 12:13 PM
  Subject: RE: [Firebird-net-provider] .NET provider Performance


  I do a lot of real-time work and C#.net is a lot faster for me than =
C++ because the multithreading is actually usable.

  Raw processing power is not a big difference.

  So if you are planning e.g. to use one thread for data-retrieval and =
another for GUI, .net is the only route...



  Peter


-------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-----

  Van: fir...@li... =
[mailto:fir...@li...] Namens Da =
Jiao
  Verzonden: donderdag 26 februari 2004 20:59
  Aan: FB-NETProvider
  Onderwerp: [Firebird-net-provider] .NET provider Performance



  Hello all,



  I am a newbie to Firebird, I am very glad that it has a .NET data =
provider. But I need to know more about its performance. Could anybody =
with practical experience with Firebird and its .NET provider tell me =
more info about its performance?



  I know using C++ API is the quickest way to access Firebird, if I use =
net-provider, what will be the performance penalty? If it is close =
enough, I will go the C# way.



  Any help is appreciated.



  Da Jiao