From: Peter M. <P.m...@de...> - 2004-02-26 20:18:07
|
I do a lot of real-time work and C#.net is a lot faster for me than C++ because the multithreading is actually usable. Raw processing power is not a big difference. So if you are planning e.g. to use one thread for data-retrieval and another for GUI, .net is the only route... Peter _____ Van: fir...@li... [mailto:fir...@li...] Namens Da Jiao Verzonden: donderdag 26 februari 2004 20:59 Aan: FB-NETProvider Onderwerp: [Firebird-net-provider] .NET provider Performance Hello all, I am a newbie to Firebird, I am very glad that it has a .NET data provider. But I need to know more about its performance. Could anybody with practical experience with Firebird and its .NET provider tell me more info about its performance? I know using C++ API is the quickest way to access Firebird, if I use net-provider, what will be the performance penalty? If it is close enough, I will go the C# way. Any help is appreciated. Da Jiao |