Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Implicit transaction support in 1.5 s ources

[Carlos G. A. <car...@te...>]

Hello:

> Great idea, will it cope with transactions already existing that wrap a
> number of calls?

I'm not sure if i understand well what you means ( i have bad english ;) 
) but if you exec a command without a transaction a new transaction will 
be started implcity and itl will be finished when you dispose the command.





-- 
Best regards

Carlos Guzmán Álvarez
Vigo-Spain