Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Question: Why must I have a transaction object supplied for command object?

[Carlos G. A. <car...@te...>]

Hello:

 > This means I can't use the connection until that
 > transaction is committed or rolled back. I can't
 > commit the transaction, because there's nothing to
 > commit - I'm only reading the data. I can't rollback
 > either, both throw exceptions.

Can you send a test case ?? which exception are you getting ??. as i 
know this is working well.

> Related to this question, I'm downloading the mono C#
> compiler tools, but I wondered how (and perhaps why
> not) I might build the source for the .NET provider
> within VS.NET2003?  I want to pull out the exception
> throw when transaction is found to be null - I don't
> quite understand any reason the transaction is always
> required.

The transaction is always required beacuse Firbird requires it always 
:), i can modify the provider for "solve" this ?? yes, i like this ?? in 
first place no :), if you start always a transaction your code will work 
with both Firebird and SQL Server ( and other too ).

At this moment VS projects doesn't exists, you can build the provider 
using NAnt ( nant.sourceforge.net )







-- 
Best regards

Carlos Guzmán Álvarez
Vigo-Spain