From: Alessandro P. <pet...@in...> - 2003-05-09 12:24:30
|
"Carlos Guzman Alvarez" <car...@te...> wrote in message news:3EB...@te...... > Hello: > > > I'm implementing in the C# GDS implementation methods for handle > Services API of Firebird, now i want to know people thoughts on some > questions: > > 1. It's interesting or not to make a set or clasess wrapping the > Services API ?? > > 2. If asnwer to the first question is Yes, how we can implement it: > 2.1 As a single public class called FbServices and let people to wrap it. > > 2.2 Make a set of classes wrapping the Services funcionaluty, for > example FbBackup, FbRestore, FbXXXXX, and here we need to think if we > want to wrap all the funcionaly or only some things and how to expose > the funcionality ( like Services API constants ). > > 2.3 Other ?? > > > My answers are: > > 1. Yes. Agree. > 2. I think method 2.2 it's better. Agree. Are you going to provide 2 different assemblies or only 1? I think having 2 assemblies would provide the option of installing only the needed set. Thanks for this wonderful piece of software. It works very well, I'm going to use it in a large project. Regards, Alessandro Petrelli. |