From: Vlad K. <hv...@us...> - 2020-10-20 11:14:45
|
20.10.2020 13:43, Dmitry Yemanov wrote: > 20.10.2020 13:40, Roman Simakov wrote: >> >>>> Because documentantion here >>>> (https://firebirdsql.org/en/firebird-date-literals/) says they are valid >>>> separators. >>> >>> Keep in mind, that link is an excerpt from Helen Borrie's Firebird Book >>> from 2004 (Firebird 1.5 era). It is descriptive of what worked at the >>> time, it is not prescriptive as to how Firebird is supposed to behave. >> >> Why not? For me and lots of other developers, who have been using such >> code, it's exactly how Firebird is supposed to behave :) >> In other words, what are the reasons to break the backward compatibility? > > AFAIU, it was discussed here in February 2018, thread "Valid date or not". I've re-read that thread quickly and I saw nor final decision, nor proposition to change (or break) rules for traditional (legacy) date\time types (without TZ). Regards, Vlad |